Advertisement

Ontological Semantics of Standards and PLM Repositories in the Product Development Phase

  • M. Franke
  • P. Klein
  • L. Schröder
  • K.-D. Thoben
Conference paper

Abstract

In order to optimally exploit the large amounts of engineering information stored in contemporary PLM systems, the concept of knowledge based engineering (KBE) can be considered from a PLM perspective. By eventually combining product structures and implicit semantics provided by PLM-systems on the one hand, and domain-specific standards on the other hand we believe to have identified a key enabler for KBE. As an initial step we describe a coupling of a CAD system with a semantic representation of engineering knowledge using formal ontologies. By application of automatic reasoning, engineering knowledge gained from the product structure and domain-specific standards allows us to reduce time-consuming manual work in classifying overlaps between parts in a CAD model as intentional overlaps (e.g. with gaskets) or design failures.

Keywords

PLM KBE Semantics Ontology Reasoner 

References

  1. 1.
    Ameri, F., Dutta, D. (2004) Product lifecycle management needs, concepts and components. Product Lifecycle Management Development Consortium, PLMDC-TR3-2004, Technical report University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bermell-Garcia, P., Fan, I.S. (2008) Practitioner requirements for integrated knowledge-based engineering in product lifecycle management. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 3(1):3–20, doi:10.1504/IJPLM.2008.019968.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enovia, I. (2009) ENOVIA – PLM Solutions – 3D Digital Collaboration – ENOVIA VPLM products – Dassault Systèmes, www.3ds.com/products/enovia/portfolio/enovia-v5/enovia-vplm/all-products/ Accessed 9 December 2009.
  4. 4.
    Fan, I., Bermell-Garciá, P. (2008) International standard development for knowledge based engineering services for product lifecycle management. Concurrent Engineering, 16:271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pugliese, D., Colombo, G., Spurio, M. (2007) About the integration between KBE and PLM. Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses, Springer, London, ISBN 978-1-84628-934-7, pp. 131–136.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    OMG (2005) KBE Services for PLM – RFP.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomke, S., Fujimoto, T. (2000) The effect of front-loading problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17:128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skarka, W. (2007) Application of MOKA methodology in generative model creation using CATIA. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20:677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nacsa, J., Bueno, R., Alzaga, A., Kovács, G.L. (2005) Knowledge management support for machine tool designers using expert enablers. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18:561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kulon, J., Mynors, D., Broomhead, P. (2006) A knowledge-based engineering design tool for metal forging. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 177:331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danjou, S., Lupa, N., Koehler, P. (2008) Approach for automated product modeling using knowledge-based design features. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 5:622–629.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Penoyer, J.A., Burnett, G., Fawcett, D.J., Liou, S.Y. (2000) Knowledge based product life cycle systems: principles of integration of KBE and C3P. Computer-Aided Design, 32:311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milton, N. (2008) Knowledge Technologies. Polimetrica, Monza.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prasad, B. (2005) What distinguishes KBE from automation. www.coe.org/coldfusion/newsnet/Jun05/knowledge.cfm#1. Accessed 2 December 2009.
  15. 15.
    Sriram, R.D. (2006) Artificial intelligence in engineering: Personal reflections. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20:3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oldham, K., Kneebone, S., Callot, M., Murton, A., Brimble, R. (1998) MOKA – A methodology and tools oriented to knowledge-based engineering applications. Changing the ways we work: Shaping the ICT-solutions for the next century, Göteborg, 198.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van der Velden, C., Bil, C., Yu, X., Smith, A. (2007) An intelligent system for automatic layout routing in aerospace design. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 3:117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colombo, G., Mosca, A., Sartori, F. (2007) Towards the design of intelligent CAD systems: An ontological approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21:153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abad-Kelly, J., Cebrián, D.P., Chulvi, V. (2009) An ontology-based approach to integrating life cycle analysis and computer aided design. Selected proceedings from the 12th International Congress on Project Engineering: Zaragoza, July 2008, ISBN 978-84-613-3557-2, pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IBM C (2009) IBM – CATIA Product Synthesis Discipline – All products in this discipline, www-01.ibm.com/software/applications/plm/catiav5/disciplines/prodsynth/products.html. Accessed 8 December 2009.
  21. 21.
    Crnkovic, I., Asklund, U., Dahlqvist, A.P. (2003) Implementing and Integrating Product Data Management and Software Configuration Management. Artech House Publishers, Norwood, ISBN 1-58053-498-8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    VDI 2230 (2003) Systematic Calculation of High Duty Bolted Joints: Joints with One Cylindrical Bolt. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ansaldi, S., Bragatto, P., Camossi, E., Giannini, F., Monti, M., Pittiglio, P. (2006) A knowledge-based tool for risk prevention on pressure equipments. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 3:99–108.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W3C (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s2. Accessed 10 December 2009.
  25. 25.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y. (2006) Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics, 5:51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sattler, U. (2010) Description Logic Reasoners. www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~sattler/reasoners.html. Accessed 10 December 2009.
  27. 27.
    W3C (2009) ManchesterSyntax – OWL. www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax. Accessed 14 December 2009.
  28. 28.
    Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K. (2007) The heterogeneous tool set. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (Eds.) Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS 07. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 519–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (Eds.) (2003) The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bermell-Garcıá, P., Fan, I.S. (2002) A KBE system for the design of wind tunnel models using reusable knowledge components. International Congress on Project Engineering, Barcelona, pp. 23–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Franke
    • 1
  • P. Klein
    • 1
  • L. Schröder
    • 1
  • K.-D. Thoben
    • 2
  1. 1.BIBABremenGermany
  2. 2.DFKIBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations