Advertisement

Interdisciplinary Function-Oriented Design and Verification for the Development of Mechatronical Products

  • R. Stark
  • H. Hayka
  • A. Figge
  • R. Woll
Conference paper

Abstract

Mechatronical products integrate components that are developed by different fields of engineering and combine them in order to provide new functionalities. The main challenge is the ever increasing complexity and the required degree of interdisciplinarity. The joint research project MIKADO adressed this demand by integrating domain specific development methods and tools into a more systems-engineering-oriented approach. Special emphasis has been placed on the early phases of product development in order to facilitate an early coordination between mechanical, electronical and software engineers and to provide them with easy means for the functional verification of virtual product models.

Keywords

Mechatronics Product development Requirements engineering Functional mock-up 

List of Abbreviations

CAD

Computer Aided Design

DMU

Digital Mock-Up

FMU

Functional Mock-Up

FOD

Function Oriented Design

OEM

Original Equipment Manufacturer

SME

Small and Medium Enterprises

VDI

Verein Deutscher Ingenieure

Notes

Acknowledgments

The joint research project MIKADO was partly funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (support code 02PG12XX), coached by the Project Management Agency Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Division Production and Manufacturing Technologies (PTKA-PFT) and coordinated by Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Bolton, W. (2009) Mechatronics: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayka, H., Staub, G., Thamburaj, V., Zhang, Q. (2008) Kooperationsplattform für mechatronische Produktentstehung. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 103:721–725.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gausemeier, J., Hahn, A., Kespohl, H.D., Seifert, L. (2006) Vernetzte Produktentwicklung. Carl Hanser Verlag, München Wien.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A., Lindemann, U. (2007) Kostengünstig Entwickeln und Konstruieren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayka, H., Langenberg, D., Zhang, Q. (2005) Integrating tools for collaborative product creation. ProSTEP iViP Science Days 2005, Cross-Domain Engineering, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stark, R., Lindow, K., Beier, G., Kind, C., Özgen, K. (2009) Quantitative Studien über die Nutzung informationstechnischer Systeme im Produktentstehungsprozess. In: Brökel, K., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H., Rieg, F., Stelzer, R. (Eds.) Vernetzte Produktentwicklung – Methoden und Werkzeugkopplung. 7. Gemeinsames Kolloquium Konstruktionstechnik, KT2009. Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, pp. 241–248.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    VDI-Gesellschaft Entwicklung Konstruktion Vertrieb (2004) VDI 2206 – Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zäh, M., Thieke, S. (2005) Collaborative requirements management for production systems. In: ProStep-iViP-Verein (ed.) Study “Engineering 2010: Setting the Course for Innovative Engineering”. VMM Wirtschaftsverlag, Augsburg, pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maletz, M., Blouin, J.G., Schnedl, H., Brisson, D., Zamazal, K. (2007) A holistic approach for integrated requirements modeling in the product development process. In: Krause, F.L. (ed.) The Future of Product Development – Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference. Springer, Berlin, pp. 196–207.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beitz, W., Pahl, G., Feldhusen, J. (2007) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rupp, C. (2009) Requirementsengineering und –management. Carl Hanser Verlag, München Wien.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krause, F.L., Franke, H.J., Gausemeier, J. (2007) Innovationspotenziale in der Produktentwicklung. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krause, F.L., Rothenburg, U., Wöhler T, Romahn, A. (2005) Functional Mock-Up. In: ProStep-iViP-Verein (ed.) Study “Engineering 2010: Setting the Course for Innovative Engineering”. VMM Wirtschaftsverlag, Augsburg, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krause, F.L., Hayka, H., Pasewaldt, B. (2006) Efficient product data sharing in collaboration life cycles. In: Elmaraghy, H.A. (ed.) Advances in Design. Springer, London, pp. 365–375.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayka, H. et al. (2009) Final Report of the Joint Project MIKADO. http://www.vp-mikado.de. Accessed 19 November 2009.
  16. 16.
    CADsys GmbH (2009) FOD Modeller. http://fod.cadsys.de. Accessed 19 November 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology (IPK)BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Industrial Information Technology, Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Department for Virtual Product CreationFraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology (IPK)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations