Skip to main content

DFM Synthesis Approach Based on Product-Process Interface Modelling: Application to the Peen Forming Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Global Product Development

Abstract

Engineering design approach are currently CAD-centred design process. Manufacturing information is selected and assessed very late in the design process and above all as a reactive task instead of being proactive to lead the design choices. DFM approaches are therefore assessment methods that compare several design alternatives and not real design approaches at all. Main added value of this research work concerns the use of a product-process interface model to jointly manage both the product and the manufacturing data in a proactive DFM way. The DFM synthesis approach and the interface model are presented via the description of the DFM software platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Least commitment” has to be understood as “including as less design constraints as possible”. CAD model is indeed currently defined thinking of the entire lifecycle (ex. manufacturing, assembly…) but this information is not really explicit in CAD product breakdown. The CAD model is then very often over constrained without any explicit design rationale. The paper focuses on the energetic and manufacturing rationale integrated in design.

  2. 2.

    Those issues are obviously not exhaustive. They are the ones currently treated by the authors.

References

  1. Liu, W., Matez, M., Zeng, Y., Brisson, D. (2009) Product Lifecycle management: A review. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2009, August 30–September 2, 2009, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, Ch., Kimura, F. (2009) Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gero, J.S. (1990) Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suh, N., Suh, N.P. (1999) Applications of Axiomatic Design, Integration of Process Knowledge into Design Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht, ISBN 0-7923-5655-1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andreasen, M., Hein, L. (1987) Integrated Product Development. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tichkiewitch, S. (1996) Specification on integrated design methodology using a multi-view product model. ESDA Proceedings of the 1996 ASME System Design and Analysis Conference, PD-Vol. 80, pp. 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krause, F.-L., Kimura, F., et al. (1993) Product modelling. Annals of the CIRP, 42(2):695–706.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yan, X.-T. (2003) A multiple perspective product modeling and simulation approach to engineering design support. Concurrent Engineering Research and Application Journal (CERAJ), 11(3):221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roucoules, L., Lafon, P., et al. (2006) Knowledge intensive approach towards multiple product modelling and geometry emergence to foster cooperative design. Proceedings of the CIRP Design seminar, Kananaskis.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roucoules, L., Tichkiewitch, S. (2000) CoDE: A co-operative design environment. A new generation of CAD systems. Concurrent Engineering Research and Application Journal (CERA), 8(4): 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tichkiewitch, S., Roucoules, L. (1999) Methodology for innovative design. CIRP Design Conference, Twente (NL).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klein Meyer, J.S, Roucoules, L., De Grave, A., Chaput, J. (2007) Case study of a MEMS switch supported by a FBS and DFM framework. Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-540-69819-7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boothroyd, G., et al. (1994) Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, ISBN 0-82479-176-2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swift, K.G., Brown, N.J. (2003) Implementation strategies for DFM. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217:827–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, Z., Shah, J. (August 2005) Domain independent shell for DfM and its application to sheet metal forming and injection molding. Computer-Aided Design, 37(9):881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochennec, F., Roucoules, L., Rouhaud, E. (2006) Mechanical analysis to identify knowledge for a DFM approach. Application to shot peen-forming process. Proceedings of Virtual Concept 2006 Conference, Playa Del Carmen, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cagan, J., Campbell, M., Finger, S., Tomiyama, T. (September 2005) A framework for computational design synthesis: Model and applications. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5:171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roucoules, L., Skander, A. (2003) Manufacturing process selection and integration in product design. Analysis and synthesis approaches. Proceedings of the CIRP Design seminar, Grenoble, France.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muh-Cerng, Wu., Wu, T.Y. (1993) A skeleton approach for modelling assembly products. Journal of Design and Manufacturing, 3:121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Albers, A., Braun, A., Clarkson, J., Enkler, H.G., Wynn, D. (2009) Contact and channel modelling to support early design of technical systems. International Conference on Engineering Design, Iced’09, 24–27 August 2009, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Skander, A., Roucoules, L., Klein Meyer, J.S. (2008) Design and manufacturing interface modelling for manufacturing processes selection and knowledge synthesis in design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37:5–7, doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1003-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schey J. (1987) Introduction to Manufacturing Processes. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work is partly supported by SNECMA industry. It is part of the MAIA project. The experimental peen forming process on the Wing Cover part has been carried out in the Sisson Lehmann (Wheelabrator group) industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Elgueder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elgueder, J., Roucoules, L., Rouhaud, E., Cochennec, F. (2011). DFM Synthesis Approach Based on Product-Process Interface Modelling: Application to the Peen Forming Process. In: Bernard, A. (eds) Global Product Development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15973-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15972-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15973-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics