DFM Synthesis Approach Based on Product-Process Interface Modelling: Application to the Peen Forming Process

  • J. Elgueder
  • L. Roucoules
  • E. Rouhaud
  • F. Cochennec
Conference paper


Engineering design approach are currently CAD-centred design process. Manufacturing information is selected and assessed very late in the design process and above all as a reactive task instead of being proactive to lead the design choices. DFM approaches are therefore assessment methods that compare several design alternatives and not real design approaches at all. Main added value of this research work concerns the use of a product-process interface model to jointly manage both the product and the manufacturing data in a proactive DFM way. The DFM synthesis approach and the interface model are presented via the description of the DFM software platform.


Product-process interface DFM Virtual prototyping Manufacturing process selection Manufacturing data management Peen forming 



This research work is partly supported by SNECMA industry. It is part of the MAIA project. The experimental peen forming process on the Wing Cover part has been carried out in the Sisson Lehmann (Wheelabrator group) industry.


  1. 1.
    Liu, W., Matez, M., Zeng, Y., Brisson, D. (2009) Product Lifecycle management: A review. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2009, August 30–September 2, 2009, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, Ch., Kimura, F. (2009) Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gero, J.S. (1990) Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4):26–36Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suh, N., Suh, N.P. (1999) Applications of Axiomatic Design, Integration of Process Knowledge into Design Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht, ISBN 0-7923-5655-1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andreasen, M., Hein, L. (1987) Integrated Product Development. Springer, London.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tichkiewitch, S. (1996) Specification on integrated design methodology using a multi-view product model. ESDA Proceedings of the 1996 ASME System Design and Analysis Conference, PD-Vol. 80, pp. 101–108.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krause, F.-L., Kimura, F., et al. (1993) Product modelling. Annals of the CIRP, 42(2):695–706.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan, X.-T. (2003) A multiple perspective product modeling and simulation approach to engineering design support. Concurrent Engineering Research and Application Journal (CERAJ), 11(3):221–234.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roucoules, L., Lafon, P., et al. (2006) Knowledge intensive approach towards multiple product modelling and geometry emergence to foster cooperative design. Proceedings of the CIRP Design seminar, Kananaskis.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roucoules, L., Tichkiewitch, S. (2000) CoDE: A co-operative design environment. A new generation of CAD systems. Concurrent Engineering Research and Application Journal (CERA), 8(4): 263–280.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tichkiewitch, S., Roucoules, L. (1999) Methodology for innovative design. CIRP Design Conference, Twente (NL).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein Meyer, J.S, Roucoules, L., De Grave, A., Chaput, J. (2007) Case study of a MEMS switch supported by a FBS and DFM framework. Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-540-69819-7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boothroyd, G., et al. (1994) Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, ISBN 0-82479-176-2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swift, K.G., Brown, N.J. (2003) Implementation strategies for DFM. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217:827–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao, Z., Shah, J. (August 2005) Domain independent shell for DfM and its application to sheet metal forming and injection molding. Computer-Aided Design, 37(9):881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cochennec, F., Roucoules, L., Rouhaud, E. (2006) Mechanical analysis to identify knowledge for a DFM approach. Application to shot peen-forming process. Proceedings of Virtual Concept 2006 Conference, Playa Del Carmen, Mexico.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cagan, J., Campbell, M., Finger, S., Tomiyama, T. (September 2005) A framework for computational design synthesis: Model and applications. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5:171–181.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roucoules, L., Skander, A. (2003) Manufacturing process selection and integration in product design. Analysis and synthesis approaches. Proceedings of the CIRP Design seminar, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muh-Cerng, Wu., Wu, T.Y. (1993) A skeleton approach for modelling assembly products. Journal of Design and Manufacturing, 3:121–133.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albers, A., Braun, A., Clarkson, J., Enkler, H.G., Wynn, D. (2009) Contact and channel modelling to support early design of technical systems. International Conference on Engineering Design, Iced’09, 24–27 August 2009, Stanford university, Stanford, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Skander, A., Roucoules, L., Klein Meyer, J.S. (2008) Design and manufacturing interface modelling for manufacturing processes selection and knowledge synthesis in design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37:5–7, doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1003-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schey J. (1987) Introduction to Manufacturing Processes. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Elgueder
    • 1
  • L. Roucoules
    • 2
  • E. Rouhaud
    • 1
  • F. Cochennec
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Concurrent Engineering, Charles Delaunay Institute – FRE 2848University of Technology of TroyesTroyes CedexFrance
  2. 2.LSIS, CNRSArts et Métiers ParisTechAix en ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations