Process Planning and Supply Chain Integration: Implications for Design Process

Conference paper

Abstract

Collaborative production among multiple enterprises is inevitable for complex product development, typically in aeronautical and astronautical engineering. There are more complex links among product design, manufacturing process and production supply chain in that area. In order to achieve their interoperation and collaboration, it is critical to transmit information between processes correctly and in good time. An initial complete product definition in design is a key to contribute to this purpose. This chapter presents the impact of process planning and supply chain design integration on the design process from three perspectives: design modelling, design methodology and design environment. A service-based collaborative framework is constructed as novel design environment for design process. A unified product information model and model-based information representation are the basis of design. And the design methodologies of design for manufacturing, design for supply chain, and design validation by simulation are adopted. The effect of the three phases as well as the integration of product design, process planning and supply chain design is discussed to sustain lifecycle information integration and consistency throughout product development processes.

Keywords

Information integration Process planning Supply chain design Design process Design modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Beijing Municipal Education Commission (Build a Project) and the postgraduate innovation funding of Beihang University.

References

  1. 1.
    Fine, C.H. (1998) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus Books, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thirumalai, S., Sinha, K.K. (2005) Customer satisfaction with order fulfillment in retail supply chains: Implications of product type in electronic B2C transactions. Journal of Operations Management, 23:291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L. (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23:371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fine, C.H., Golany, B., Naseraldin, H. (2005) Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach. Journal of Operations Management, 23:389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Er, M., MacCarthy, B. (2006) Managing product variety in multinational corporation supply chains a simulation study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 17(8):1117–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiao, J.X., Xu, Q.L., Wu, Z., Ng, N.K. (2009) Coordinating product, process, and supply chain decisions: A constraint satisfaction approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 22:992–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackhurst, J., Wu, T., O’Grady, P. (2005) PCDM: A decision support modeling methodology for supply chain, product and process design decisions. Journal of Operations Management, 23:325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fixson, S.K. (2005) Product architecture assessment: A tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions. Journal of Operations Management, 23:345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, L.Y., Lee, C.K.M., Xu, Q.L. (2010) Towards product customization: An integrated order fulfillment system. Computers in Industry, 61(3):213–222.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernard, A., Perry, N. (2003) Fundamental concepts of product/technology/process informational integration for process modeling and process planning. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 16(7–8):557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao, L., Qiao, L. (2008) Method for complex process modeling based on process specification language. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 29(4):1068–1072.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, W. (2009) Research on the manufacturing data management based on service, Doctor Thesis of Beihang University.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A, Bernard. (2000) Models and approaches for integrated design and manufacturing. APII, JESA, 34(2–3):163–193.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernard, A., Bourdet, P. (1990) Features, a new approach to improve productivity in the realization of forging dies prints. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 24:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bernard, A. (1993) The feature approach for the Integrated design and machining of forming dies. Robotics & Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 10(1–2):71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mony, C., Dupinet, E., Bernard, A. (1992) A mechanical product integrated model formachining and manufacture of raw parts. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 21(2):137–145.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez, F., Rosado, P. (2004) General information model for representing machining features in CAPP systems. International Journal of Production Research, 42(9):1815–1842.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weilguny, L.J.H., Gerhard, D. (2009) Implementation of a knowledge-based engineering concept using feature technology at an automotive OEM. International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’09), 24–27 August, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qiao, L., Zhang, J. (2009) Integrated Process Planning Based on 3D Product Models. Key Engineering Materials, 407–408:298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chae, H., Kim, K., Choi, Y., Kim, C.H., Lee, J.Y. (2007) A view-based approach to modeling product semantics in design chains. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32:863–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ding, L., Davies, D., McMahon, C.A. (2009) The integration of lightweight representation and annotation for collaborative design representation. Research in Engineering Design, 19:223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiao, L., Guo, J.F. (2004) Product development process modeling with product life cycle consideration. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10(1):15–22.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qiao, L., Guo, J.F. (2008) Stochastic network planning and simulation method for concurrent product development. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12:2354–2360.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howard, L., Lewis, H. (2003) The development of a database system to optimize manufacturing processes during design. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 134:374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu, L., Li, Z.B., Li, S.C., Tang, F.M. (2007) A decision support system for product design in concurrent engineering. Decision Support Systems, 42:2029–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aken, J.E.V. (2005) Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Design Studies, 26:379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lockheed Martin SAVE Team (1998) SAVE Beta Test Usage Guidelines. Online available http://skipper.mar.external.lmco.com/save/
  28. 28.
    Kühn, W. (2006) Digital factory-simulation enhancing the product and production engineering process. Proceeding of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, California, USA, pp. 1899–1906.Google Scholar
  29. 29.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringAdvanced Manufacturing Technology and Systems Research Center, Beihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations