Integrating Innovations into Vehicle Projects – Towards a Robust “Touch Down” Process

Conference paper

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to identify the levers, the obstacles and potential variables that help to create a more robust process for integrating innovations into vehicle development projects. The ultimate aim of our work is to help to increase the numbers of innovations providing high added value for the customer that are assimilated into future vehicles.The analysis that we present is the result of an in-depth diagnostic study (40 persons consulted, 80 hof interviews), feedback from five vehicle development projects and detailed analysis of three innovation projects.

Keywords

Innovation Integration process Robustness, Systemic model Automotive industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Hathchuel, A. (2006) Les Processus D’innovations, Conception Innovante et Croissance des Entreprises. Hermes Lavoisier, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giebel, M., Essmann, H., Du Preez, N., Jochem, R. (2009) Improved innovation trough the integration of quality gates into the entreprise and product lifecycle roadmaps. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing science and Technology, 1(3):199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buet, G., Gidel, T., Millet, T. (2008) New technologies “touch down” process. Proceedings of IDMME – Virtual Concept, Beijing.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B. (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cusumano, M.A., Nobeaka, K. (1999) Le Management Multi-Projets, Optimiser le Développement de Produits. Dunod.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taguchi, G., Clausing, D. (1990) Robust quality. Harward Business Review, (January–February):65–75.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chalupnik, M.J., Wynn, D.C., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J. (2007) Understanding design process robustness: A modelling approach. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jahn, T., Binz, H. (2009) A highly fexible project maturity management method for the early phase of product development, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’09, Standford.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemoigne, J.L. (1990) La Modélisation des Systèmes Complexes. Dunod.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gidel, T., Zonghero, W. (2006) Management de Projet, Volume 2 (approfondissements). Hermes Science, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chesbrough, H. (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown, T. (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akao, Y. (1990) Quality Function Deployment – Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shiba, S., Graham, A., Walden, D. (1993) A New American TQM – Four practical Revolutions in Management. Productivity Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giard, V., Midler, C. (1993) Pilotages de projet et entreprises. Economica, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chvidchenko, I., Chevalier, J. (1997) Conduite et Gestion de Projets. Cédapuès Editions, Toulouse (France).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ullman, D.G. (2001) Robust decision making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1):3–13.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia, R., Catalone, R. (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminologie: A literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2):110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Velloso-Rodriguez, K., Truchot, P. (2009) Classification des Projets selon leur but d’origine, Confere’09, N°64, Marrakech, Maroc.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Midler, C., Beaume, R. (2010) Project-based learning patterns for dominant design renewal: The case of electric vehicle. International Journal of Project Management 28(2):142–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RENAULT SAS, Industrial Design, Renault TechnocentreGuyancourtFrance
  2. 2.UTC, Centre de Recherche Pierre GuillaumatCompiegneFrance
  3. 3.Design and Ecodesign Methodology Lab, Quartier MayolMaison des Technologies, LISMMA – SUPMECA ToulonToulonFrance

Personalised recommendations