Study on Membrane Protein Interaction Networks by Constructing Gene Regulatory Network Model

  • Yong-Sheng Ding
  • Yi-Zhen Shen
  • Li-Jun Cheng
  • Jing-Jing Xu
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 98)

Abstract

At present, about a quarter of all genes in most genomes contain transmembrane (TM) helices, and among the overall cellular interactome, helical membrane protein interaction is a major component. Interactions between membrane proteins play a significant role in a variety of cellular phenomena, including the transduction of signals across membranes, the transfer of membrane proteins between the plasma membrane and internal organelles, and the assembly of oligomeric protein structures. However, current experimental techniques for large-scale detection of protein-protein interactions are biased against membrane proteins. In this paper, we construct membrane protein interaction network based on gene regulatory network model. GRN model is proposed to understand the dynamic and collective control of developmental process and the characters of membrane protein interaction network, including small-world network, scale free distributing and robustness, and its significance for biology. The proposed method is proved to be effective for the study of membrane protein interaction network. The results show that the approach holds a high potential to become a useful tool in prediction of membrane protein interactions.

Keywords

membrane protein interaction network gene regulatory network small-world network scale free distributing robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chou, K.C., Shen, H.B.: MemType-2L: A Web server for predicting membrane proteins and their types by incorporating evolution information through Pse-PSSM. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 360(2), 339–345 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao, P.Y., Ding, Y.S., Chou, K.C.: Prediction of membrane protein interactions based on a fuzzy support vector machine classifier (to appear)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ren, L.H., Ding, Y.S., Shen, Y.Z., Zhang, X.F.: Multi-agent-based bio-network for systems biology: Protein-protein interaction network as an example. Amino Acid 35(3), 565–572 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng, L., Baker, M.J., Lockyer, N.P., Vickerman, J.C., Ewing, A.G., Winograd, N.: Investigating lipid-lipid and lipid-protein interactions in model membranes by ToF-SIMS. Applied Surface Science 255(4), 1190–1192 (2008)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dario, L., Bernard, C., Stefanie, D.K.: Lipid membrane interactions of indacaterol and salmeterol: Do they influence their pharmacological properties? European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 38(5), 533–547 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toshinori, S., Haruyuki, I., Ena, O., Naoya, S., Hiroshi, U., Ryoichi, K.: Development of membrane chip system for study on membrane-protein interaction. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 108(suppl. 1), S147–S164 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peter, M.: Glycolipid transfer proteins and membrane interaction. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1788(1), 267–272 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dsssow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E.M., Odell, G.M.: The segment polargity network is a robust development module. Nature 406(13), 188–192 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dsssow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E.M., Odell, G.M.: Formulation of a model of the segment polarity network as a system of first-order ordinary differential equations using Ingeneue (2000), http://www.ingenue.org
  10. 10.
    Wang, Z.D., Lam, J., Wei, G.L., Fraser, K., Liu, X.H.: Filtering for nonlinear genetic regulatory networks with stochastic disturbances. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 53(10), 2448–2457 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Z.D., Gao, H.J., Cao, J.D., Liu, X.H.: On delayed genetic regulatory networks with polytopic uncertainties: robust stability analysis. IEEE Trans. NanoBioscience 7(2), 154–163 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ben-Tabou de-Leon, S., Davidson, E.H.: Modeling the dynamics of transcriptional gene regulatory networks for animal development. Developmental Biology 325(2), 317–328 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller, J.P., Lo, R.S., Ben-Hur, A., Desmarais, C., Stagljar, I., Noble, W.S., Fields, S.: Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(34), 12123–12128 (2005)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watts, D.J.: Small Worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825), 268–276 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereira-Lea, J.B., Levy, E.D., Teichmann, S.A.: The origins and evolution of functional modules: Lessons from protein complexes. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361(1467), 507–517 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong-Sheng Ding
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yi-Zhen Shen
    • 1
  • Li-Jun Cheng
    • 1
  • Jing-Jing Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Sciences and TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.Engineering Research Center of Digitized Textile & Fashion Technology, Ministry of EducationDonghua UniversityShanghaiP.R. China

Personalised recommendations