Research on Expression Method of a Unified Constraint Multi-domain Model for Complex Products

  • Chen Guojin
  • Su Shaohui
  • Gong Youping
  • Zhu Miaofen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 98)

Abstract

This paper studies the modeling method based on the unified constraint systems for complex products’ designing and analyzing. The method describes the complex product’s multi-domain optimization in a unified constraint model. The unified constraint expression for the product’s multi-domain simulation and optimization model can implemented by the mapping mechanism transferring the physical models into the mathematical models. Aiming at designing and analyzing for the complex mechanical products of the multi-field mixture and the sub-hierarchy, the paper studies the product’s associated constraints of the different areas’ hierarchical relationship, the constitutive constraints expressing the product areas’ constitutive relations, the body constraints describing the relationship between the association and the constitution, and the discrete constraints representing the discrete events to extract the commonality in different areas for these four constraints on the basis of the geometric constraints’ representation and the physical systems’ modeling. In connection with the commonality in the constraints, the products’ model formulation in the various fields is unified in the constraint level based on equations using the various structural elements’ constraints based on a unified expression of mathematical equations.

Keywords

constraint multi-domain modeling and simulating homotopy iteration method Modelica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sobieskij, S.: On the Sensitivity of Complex, Internally Coupled System. AIAA Journal (28), 153–160 (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zeyong, Y., et al.: Study on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aero-engine. Engineering Science (9), 1–10 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bao-gui, W., Hong-zhong, H., Ye, T.: Functional Digital Prototype-based MDO & Simulation. Journal of System Simulation (19), 861–864 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elmqvist, H., Mattsson, S.E., Otter, M.: Object-oriented and Hybrid Modeling in Modelica. The Journal of European systemautomatics (35), 1–10 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yizhong, W., Min, L., Liping, C.: Development of Hybrid Modeling Platform for Multi-domain Physical System. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (18), 120–126 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jian-Wan, D., Li-Ping, C., Fan-Li, Z., Hua, H.: Consistency Analysis of Complex Declarative Simulation Models. Journal of Software (16), 1868–1875 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Guojin
    • 1
  • Su Shaohui
    • 1
  • Gong Youping
    • 1
  • Zhu Miaofen
    • 1
  1. 1.Hangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations