Skip to main content

A Comparison between Growing and Variably Dense Self Organizing Maps for Incremental Learning in Hubel Weisel Models of Concept Representation

  • Conference paper
Trends in Intelligent Robotics (FIRA 2010)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 103))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1411 Accesses

Abstract

Hubel Weisel models of pattern recognition are thought to be anatomically and physiologically faithful models of information representation in the cortex. They describe sensory information as being encoded in a hierarchy of increasingly sophisticated representations across the layers of the cortex. They have been shown in previous studies as robust models of object recognition. In a previous work, we have also shown Hubel Weisel models as being capable of representing a hierarchy of concepts. In this paper, we explore incremental learning with respect to Hubel Weisel models of concept representation. The challenges of incremental learning in the Hubel Weisel model are discussed. We then compare the use of variably dense self organizing maps to perform incremental learning against the original implementation using growing self organizing maps. The use of variable density self organizing maps shows better results in terms of the percentage of documents correctly clustered. The percentage improvement in clustering accuracy is in some cases up to 50% over the original GSOM implementation for the incrementally learnt module. However, we also highlight the issues that make the evaluation of such a model a challenging one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cadieu, C., Kouh, M., Pasupathy, A., Conner, C., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T.A.: A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance. Journal of Neurophysiology 98, 1733–1750 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. George, D., Hawkins, J.: A hierarchical Bayesian Model of Invariant Pattern Recognition in the Visual Cortex. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 1812–1817 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farahmand, N., Dezfoulian, M., GhiasiRad, H., Mokhtari, A., Nouri, A.: Online Temporal Pattern Learning. In: IJCNN 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fukushima, K.: Neocognitron capable of incremental learning. Neural networks 17, 37–46 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mountcastle, V.: An Organizing Principle for Cerebral Function: The Unit Model and the Distributed System. In: Edelman, G.M., Mountcastle, V.B. (eds.) The Mindful Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hubel, D., Weisel, T.: Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non striate visual areas (18 and 19) of a cat. Journal of NeuroPhysiology 28, 229–289 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukushima, K.: Neocognitron for handwritten digit recognition 1. Neurocomputing 51C, 161–180 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alahakhoon, D., Halgamuge, S.K., Srinivasan, B.: Dynamic Self Organizing maps with controlled growth for Knowledge discovery. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11(3), 601–614 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagus, K.: Text retrieval using self-organized document maps. Neural Processing Letters 15(1), 21–29 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fellbaum, C.: Wordnet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Mc Clelland, J.L., Rogers, T.T.: The parallel distributed processsing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4(4), 310–322 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sloutsky, V.M.: The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 246–251 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sloutsky, V.M., Kloos, H., Fisher, A.: When looks are everything – appearance similarity versus kind information in early induction. Psychological Science 18(2), 179–185 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rauber, A., Merkl, D., Dittenbach, M.: The growing hierarchical self organizing map, exploratory analysis of high dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13(6), 1331–1341 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers, T.T., McClelland, J.L.: Precis of Semantic Cognition, a Parallel distributed Processing approach. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 31, 689–749 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramanathan, K., Shi, L., Chong, T.C.: A Hubel Weisel model for hierarchical representation of concepts in textual documents. In: The Annual Congress of the Cognitive Science Society (2010) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quillian, M.R.: Semantic Information Processing, pp. 227–270. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada, A., Kanouchi, M., Arita, D., Tanuguchi, R.: Robust estimation of human posture using incremental learning self organizing Map. In: IJCNN 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Widrow, B., Etemadi, M.: Cognitive memory: human and machine. In: IJCNN 2009, pp. 3516–523 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daniel, N.C.k., Ramanathan, K., Luping, S., Vadakkepat, P. (2010). A Comparison between Growing and Variably Dense Self Organizing Maps for Incremental Learning in Hubel Weisel Models of Concept Representation. In: Vadakkepat, P., et al. Trends in Intelligent Robotics. FIRA 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15810-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15810-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15809-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15810-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics