Advertisement

Infection Imaging Using SPECT-CT

  • Onelio Geatti
  • Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
  • Fernando Di Gregorio
  • Elena Lazzeri
  • Alberto Signore
Chapter
  • 1.3k Downloads

Abstract

The clinical use of radiolabelled white blood cells (WBC) is of invaluable importance for the diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases and for research purposes. In the field of inflammation and infection imaging, radiolabelled white blood cell scintigraphy (WBC-S) is the gold standard technique for infection detection [1–4]. The body of evidence accumulated so far about the use of WBC-S all over the world makes this technique the method of choice, and it will be the standard technique for many years to come. Over the past 30 years, there has been phenomenal growth in the use of this technique to satisfy clinical demands.

Keywords

Infective Endocarditis Early Image Prosthetic Joint Infection Knee Prosthesis Scintigraphy Finding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Annovazzi A, Bagni B, Burroni L, D’Alessandria C, Signore A. Nuclear medicine imaging of inflammatory/infective disorders of the abdomen. Nucl Med Commun. 2005;26: 657–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prandini N, Lazzeri E, Rossi B, Erba P, Parisella MG, Signore A. Nuclear medicine imaging of bone infections. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:633–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cascini GL, De Palma D, Matteucci F, Biggi A, Rambaldi PF, Signore A, Mansi L. Fever of unknown origin, infection of subcutaneous devices, brain abscesses and endocarditis. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:213–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Capriotti G, Chianelli M, Signore A. Nuclear medicine imaging of diabetic foot infection: results of meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:757–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roca M, De Vries EFJ, Jamar F, Israel O, Signore A. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 111In-oxine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:835–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vries EFJ, Roca M, Jamar F, Israel O, Signore A. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with 99mTc-HMPAO. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:842–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roca M, Martin-Comin J, Becker W, Bernardo-Filho M, Gutfilen B, Moisan A, Peters M, Prats E, Rodrigues M, Sampson C, Signore A, Sinzinger H, Thakur M. A consensus protocol for white blood cells labelling with technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:797–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Signore A, Glaudemans AWJM, Lazzeri E, Prandini N, Viglietti AL, Devicienti A, De Vries EFJ, Dierckx RAJO. Development and testing of a new disposable sterile device for labelling white blood cells. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IAEA Guidelines Radiolabelled autologous cells.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Signore A, Mather SJ, Paiggio G, Malviya G, Dierckx RA. Molecular imaging of inflammation/infection: nuclear medicine and optical imaging agents and methods. Chem Rev. 2010;110:3112–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palestro CJ, Love C, Bhargava KK. Labeled leukocyte imaging: current status and future directions. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53:105–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palestro CJ, Love C, Tronco GG, Tomas MB, Rini JN. Combined labeled leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid marrow imaging for diagnosing musculoskeletal infection: principles, technique, interpretation, indications and limitations. RadioGraphics. 2006;26:859–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filippi L, Schillaci O. Tc-99m HMPAO-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy for bone and joint infections. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1908–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glaudemans AWJM, Maccioni F, Mansi L, Dierckx RAJO, Signore A. Imaging of cell trafficking in Crohn’s disease. J Cell Phys. 2010;223:562–71.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biancone L, Schillaci O, Capoccetti F, Bozzi RM, Fina D, Petruzziello C, Geremia A, Simonetti F, Pallone F. Technetium-99m-HMPAO labeled leukocyte single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) for assessing Crohn’s disease extent and intestinal infiltration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:344–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Syrjälä M, Valtonen V, Liwendahl K, Myllylä G. Diagnostic significance of Indium-111 granulocyte scintigraphy in febrile patients. J Nucl Med. 1987 ;28(2): 155–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kjaer A, Lebech AM, Eigtved A, Hojgaard L. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 111In-granulocyte scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31(5):622–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. 18.
    Yao X, Wei D, Soden Jr C, Summers MF, Beckett D. Structure of the carboxyl terminal fragment of the apo-biotin carboxyl carrier subunit of Escherichia coli acetyl-coA carboxylase. Biochemistry. 1997;36:15089–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 19.
    Attwood PV. The structure and the mechanism of action of pyruvate carboxylase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1995;27:231–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 20.
    Devillers A, Moisan A, Jean S, Arvieux C, Bourguet P. Technetium-99m hexamethyl-propylene amine oxime leucocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections: a retrospective study in 116 patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22:302–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 21.
    Palestro CJ, Torres MA. Radionuclide imaging in orthopaedic infections. Semin Nucl Med. 1997;27:334–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 22.
    Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ. Radionuclide diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: indium-111-leukocyte and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1861–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 23.
    Coleman RE, Welch D. Possible pitfalls with clinical imaging of indium-111 leukocytes. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:122–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 24.
    Mok YP, Carney WH, Fernandez-Ulloa M. Skeletal photopenic lesions in In-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:1322–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 25.
    Fernandex-Ulloa M, Vasavada PJ, Hanslits ML, Volarich DT, Elgazzar AH. Diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: clinical, radiological and scintigraphic features. Orthopedics. 1985;8:1144–50.Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    Datz FL, Thorne DA. Cause and significance of cold bone defects on indium-111-labelled leukocyte imaging. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:820–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 27.
    Whalen JL, Brown ML, McLeod R, Fitzgerald Jr RH. Limitations of indium leukocyte imaging for the diagnosis of spine infections. Spine. 1991;16:193–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 28.
    Jacobson AF, Gilles CP, Cerqueira MD. Photopenic defects in marrow containing skeleton on indium-111 leucocyte scintigraphy: prevalence at sites suspected of osteomyelitis and as an incidental finding. Eur J Nucl Med. 1992;19:858–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 29.
    Even-Sapir E, Martin RH. Degenerative disc disease. A cause for diagnostic dilemma on In-111 WBC studies in suspected osteomyelitis. Clin Nucl Med. 1994;19:388–92.Google Scholar
  13. 30.
    Roelants V, Tang T, Ide C, Laloux P. Cold vertebra on 111In-white blood cell scintigraphy. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:236–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 31.
    Gratz S, Dorner J, Oestmann JW, Opitz M, Behr T, Meller J, et al. 67Ga-citrate and 99mTc-MDP for estimating the severity of vertebral osteomyelitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:111–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 32.
    Love C, Patel M, Lonner BS, Tomas MB, Palestro CJ. Diagnosing spinal osteomyelitis: a comparison of bone and Ga-67 scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:963–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 33.
    Stumpe KD, Dazzi H, Schaffner A, von Schulthess GK. Infection imaging using whole-body FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:822–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 34.
    Kalicke T, Schmitz A, Risse JH, Arens S, Keller E, Hansis M, et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in infectious bone diseases: results of histologically confirmed cases. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:524–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 35.
    Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:47–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 36.
    Schmitz A, Kalicke T, Willkomm P, Grunwald F, Kandyba J, Schmitz O. Use of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in assessing the process of tuberculous spondylitis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:541–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 37.
    Gratz S, Dorner J, Fischer U, Behr TM, Behé M, Altenvoerde G, et al. 18F-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:516–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 38.
    De Winter F, Gemmel F, Van De Wiele C, Poffijn B, Uyttendaele D, Dierckx R. 18-Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of infection in the postoperative spine. Spine. 2003;28:1314–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 39.
    Rosen RS, Fayad L, Wahl RL. Increased 18F-FDG uptake in degenerative disease of the spine: characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1274–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 40.
    Wolansky LJ, Heary RF, Patterson T, Friedenberg JS, Tholany J, Chen JK, et al. Pseudosparing of the endplate: a potential pitfall in using MR imaging to diagnose infectious spondylitis. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:777–80.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    Enzmann DR. Infection and inflammation. In: Enzmann DR, DeLaPaz RL, Rubin JB, editors. Magnetic Resonance of the Spine. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990. p. 260–300.Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    Wagner SC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Przybylski GJ, Parker L. Can imaging findings help differentiate spinal neuropathic arthropathy from disk space infection? Initial experience. Radiology. 2000;214:693–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 43.
    Kylampaa-Back ML, Suominen RA, Salo SA, Soiva M, Korkala OI, Mokka RE. Postoperative discitis: outcome and late magnetic resonance image evaluation of ten patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1999;88:61–4.Google Scholar
  27. 44.
    Van Goethem JW, Parizel PM, van den Hauwe L, Van de Kelft E, Verlooy J, De Schepper AM. The value of MRI in the diagnosis of postoperative spondylodiscitis. Neuroradiology. 2000;42:580–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 45.
    Grane P, Josephsson A, Seferlis A, Tullberg T. Septic and aseptic postoperative discitis in the lumbar spine: evaluation by MR imaging. Acta Radiol. 1998;39:108–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 46.
    Lazzeri E, Erba P, Perri M, Tascini C, Doria R, Giorgetti J, et al. Scintigraphic imaging of vertebral osteomyelitis with 111In-biotin. Spine. 2008;33(7):198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 47.
    Lazzeri E, Erba P, Perri M, Doria R, Tascini C, Mariani G. Clinical impact of SPECT/CT with In-111 biotin on the management of patients with suspected spine infection. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:12–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Onelio Geatti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
    • 3
  • Fernando Di Gregorio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elena Lazzeri
    • 4
  • Alberto Signore
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.U.O. Medicina NucleareAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Misericordia di UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.Nuclear MedicineUniversity HospitalUdineItaly
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.U.O. Medicina NucleareAzienda Ospedialiero-Universitaria PisanaPisaItaly
  5. 5.Nuclear Medicine, 2nd Faculty of MedicineUniversità Sapienza di RomaRomaItaly
  6. 6.Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations