Advertisement

Auxiliary Constructs for Proving Liveness in Compassion Discrete Systems

  • Teng Long
  • Wenhui Zhang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6252)

Abstract

For proving response properties in systems with compassion requirements, a deductive rule is introduced in [1]. In order to use the rule, auxiliary constructs are needed. They include helpful assertions and ranking functions defined on a well-founded domain. The work in [2] computes ranking functions for response properties in systems with justice requirements. This paper presents an approach which extends the work in [2] with compassion requirements. The approach is illustrated on two examples of sequential and concurrent programs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pnueli, A., Sa’ar, Y.: All you need is compassion. In: Logozzo, F., Peled, D.A., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) VMCAI 2008. LNCS, vol. 4905, pp. 233–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balaban, I., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: Modular ranking abstraction. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 18(1), 5–44 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graf, S., Saïdi, H.: Construction of abstract state graphs with pvs. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ball, T., Majumdar, R., Millstein, T.D., Rajamani, S.K.: Automatic predicate abstraction of c programs. In: PLDI, pp. 203–213 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Long, T., Zhang, W.: Auxiliary constructs for proving liveness in compassion discrete systems. Technical Report, ISCAS–LCS–09–03, Institute of Sofware, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2009), http://lcs.ios.ac.cn/~zwh/tr/
  6. 6.
    Kesten, Y., Pnueli, A.: Verification by augmented finitary abstraction. Inf. Comput. 163(1), 203–243 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balaban, I., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: Ranking abstraction as companion to predicate abstraction. In: Wang, F. (ed.) FORTE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3731, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kesten, Y., Pnueli, A., Vardi, M.Y.: Verification by augmented abstraction: The automata-theoretic view. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 62(4), 668–690 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fang, Y., Piterman, N., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: Liveness with invisible ranking. In: Steffen, B., Levi, G. (eds.) VMCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 2937, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fang, Y., Piterman, N., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: Liveness with incomprehensible ranking. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Completing the temporal picture. Theor. Comput. Sci. 83(1), 91–130 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Emerson, E.A., Lei, C.L.: Modalities for model checking: Branching time logic strikes back. Sci. Comput. Program. 8(3), 275–306 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arons, T., Pnueli, A., Ruah, S., Xu, J., Zuck, L.D.: Parameterized verification with automatically computed inductive assertions. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., Finkel, A. (eds.) CAV 2001. LNCS, vol. 2102, pp. 221–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teng Long
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wenhui Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of SoftwareChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Information Science and EngineeringGraduate University of China Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations