Multidimensional Classification Approach for Defining Product Line Engineering Transition Strategies

  • Bedir Tekinerdogan
  • Eray Tüzün
  • Ediz Şaykol
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6287)


It is generally acknowledged that the transitioning process to a product line engineering approach is not trivial and as such requires a planned transition process. Different classifications of transition strategies have been proposed in the literature. It appears that these classification schemes are usually based on a single dimension. However, the adoption of a transition strategy is dependent on various criteria and very often it is not easy to characterize the required transition strategy. An appropriate characterization of the transition strategy is important for carrying out the right transition activities and steps to provide an operational product line engineering approach. In this paper, we first provide a conceptual model for defining the concepts related to transition strategies and then propose a multi-dimensional classification approach that aims to provide a more complete view on transition strategies.


software product line engineering product line transition strategy multi-dimensional classification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bayer, J., et al.: PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines. In: Proc. Symposium Software Reusability (SSR 1999), pp. 122–131. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boeckle, G., Bermejo, J., Knauber, P., Krueger, C., Leite, J., van der Linden, F., Northrop, L., Stark, M., Weiss, D.: Adopting and institutionalizing a product line culture. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, p. 49. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosch, J.: Maturity and Evolution in Software Product Lines: Approaches, Artefacts and Organization. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bühne, S., Chastek, G., Kakola, T., Knauber, P., Northrop, L., Thiel, S.: Exploring the context of product line adoption. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3014, pp. 19–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clements, P.C., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clements, P.C., Jones, L.G., McGregor, J.D., Northrop, L.M.: Getting there from here: A Roadmap for Software Product Line Adoption. CACM 49(12) (December 2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE Software, Special Issue of Software Product Lines (July/August 2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krueger, C.W.: New Methods in Software Product Line Development. In: Proc. of 10th Software Product Line Conference, BigLever Software, Austin, TX (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering – Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmid, K., Verlage, M.: The Economic Impact of Product Line Adoption and Evolution. IEEE Software 19(4), 50–57 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bedir Tekinerdogan
    • 1
  • Eray Tüzün
    • 2
  • Ediz Şaykol
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringBilkent UniversityBilkent AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Havelsan A.Ş., Peace Eagle Program, Research and Development Team, ODTU TeknokentAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations