Cognitive Invariants of Geographic Event Conceptualization: What Matters and What Refines?
Behavioral experiments addressing the conceptualization of geographic events are few and far between. Our research seeks to address this deficiency by developing an experimental framework on the conceptualization of movement patterns. In this paper, we report on a critical experiment that is designed to shed light on the question of cognitively salient invariants in such conceptualization. Invariants have been identified as being critical to human information processing, particularly for the processing of dynamic information. In our experiment, we systematically address cognitive invariants of one class of geographic events: single entity movement patterns. To this end, we designed 72 animated icons that depict the movement patterns of hurricanes around two invariants: size difference and topological equivalence class movement patterns endpoints. While the endpoint hypothesis, put forth by Regier (2007), claims a particular focus of human cognition to ending relations of events, other research suggests that simplicity principles guide categorization and, additionally, that static information is easier to process than dynamic information. Our experiments show a clear picture: Size matters. Nonetheless, we also find categorization behaviors consistent with experiments in both the spatial and temporal domain, namely that topology refines these behaviors and that topological equivalence classes are categorized consistently. These results are critical steppingstones in validating spatial formalism from a cognitive perspective and cognitively grounding work on ontologies.
KeywordsGeographic event conceptualization topology similarity spatial cognition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bryant, R.: Discovery and decision: Exploring the metaphysics and epistemology of scientific classification. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press Associated Univ. Presses, London (2000)Google Scholar
- Cohn, A.G.: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning Techniques. In: Brewka, G., Habel, C., Nebel, B. (eds.) KI 1997. LNCS, vol. 1303, pp. 1–30. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
- Egenhofer, M.J., Al-Taha, K.K.: Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds.) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, pp. 196–219. Springer, Berlin (1992)Google Scholar
- Freksa, C.: Qualitative spatial reasoning. In: Mark, D.M., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, pp. 361–372. Kluwer, Dodrecht (1991)Google Scholar
- Galton, A.: Qualitative spatial change. Spatial information systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
- Janowicz, K., Keßler, C., Schwarz, M., Wilkes, M., Panov, I., Espeter, M., et al.: Algorithm, implementation and application of the SIM-DL similarity server. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4853, pp. 128–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klix, F.: Die Natur des Verstandes. Hogrefe, Göttingen (1992)Google Scholar
- Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.J.: Interpretation of behaviors from a viewpoint of topology. In: Gottfried, B., Aghajan, H. (eds.) Behaviour monitoring and interpretation. Ambient intelligence and smart environments, pp. 75–97. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
- Lockhead, G.R., Pomerantz, J.R. (eds.): The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner. American Psychological Assoc., Washington (1991)Google Scholar
- Lu, S., Harter, D.: The role of overlap and end state in perceiving and remembering events. In: Sun, R. (ed.) The 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 26-29, pp. 1729–1734. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
- Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Topology of prototypical spatial relations between lines and regions in English and Spanish. In: Proceedings, Auto Carto 12, Charlotte, North Carolina, March 1995, pp. 245–254 (1995)Google Scholar
- Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M.J.: Modeling spatial relations between lines and regions: Combining formal mathematical models and human subject testing. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 21(3), 195–212 (1994)Google Scholar
- Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar
- Regier, T.: The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constraint connectionism. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
- Regier, T., Zheng, M.: Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31(4), 705–719 (2007)Google Scholar
- Shaw, R., McIntyre, M., Mace, W.: The role of symmetry in event perception. In: MacLeod, R.B., Pick, H.L. (eds.) Perception. Essays in honour of James J. Gibson, pp. 276–310. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1974)Google Scholar
- Shipley, T.F.: An invitation to an event. In: Shipley, T.F., Zacks, J.M. (eds.) Understanding events: How humans see, represent, and act on events, pp. 3–30. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- Tversky, B., Zacks, J.M., Hard, B.M.: The structure of experience. In: Shipley, T.F., Zacks, J.M. (eds.) Understanding events: How humans see, represent, and act on events, pp. 436–464. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- Wolff, P.: Dynamics and the perception of causal events. In: Shipley, T.F., Zacks, J.M. (eds.) Understanding events: How humans see, represent, and act on events. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar