Skip to main content

Making Ontology-Based Knowledge and Decision Trees Interact: An Approach to Enrich Knowledge and Increase Expert Confidence in Data-Driven Models

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6291))

Abstract

When using data-driven models to make simulations and predictions in experimental sciences, it is essential for the domain expert to be confident about the predicted values. Increasing this confidence can be done by using interpretable models, so that the expert can follow the model reasoning pattern, and by integrating expert knowledge to the model itself. New pieces of useful formalised knowledge can then be integrated to an existing corpus while data-driven models are tuned according to the expert advice. In this paper, we propose a generic interactive procedure, relying on an ontology to model qualitative knowledge and on decision trees as a data-driven rule learning method.

A case study based on data issued from multiple scientific papers in the field of cereal transformation illustrates the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Seising, R.: Soft computing and the life science-philosophical remarks. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, July 2007, pp. 798–803. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-David, A., Sterling, L.: Generating rules from examples of human multiattribute decision making should be simple. Expert Syst. Appl. 31(2), 390–396 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stumme, G., Hotho, A., Berendt, B.: Semantic web mining: State of the art and future directions. J. of Web Semantics 4, 124–143 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Expert-driven validation of rule-based user models in personalization applications. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5(1-2), 33–58 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Parekh, V., Gwo, J.P.J.: Mining Domain Specific Texts and Glossaries to Evaluate and Enrich Domain Ontologies. In: International Conference of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Las Vegas, NV, The International Multi Conference in Computer Science and Computer Engineering (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ling, T., Kang, B.H., Johns, D.P., Walls, J., Bindoff, I.: Expert-driven knowledge discovery. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pp. 174–178 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maillot, N., Thonnat, M.: Ontology based complex object recognition. Image and Vision Computing 26, 102–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, J., Silvescu, A., Honavar, V.: Ontology-driven induction of decision trees at multiple levels of abstraction. LNCS, pp. 316–323 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quinlan, J.: C4. 5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quinlan, J.: Induction of decision trees. Machine learning 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thomopoulos, R., Baget, J., Haemmerle, O.: Conceptual graphs as cooperative formalism to build and validate a domain expertise. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4604, p. 112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dalbon, G., Grivon, D., Pagnani, M.: Continuous manufacturing process. In: Kruger, J., Matsuo, R., Dick, J. (eds.) Pasta and Noodle Technology, AACC, St Paul, MN-USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Young, L.: Application of Baking Knowledge in Software Systems. In: Technology of Breadmaking, 2nd edn., pp. 207–222. Springer, US (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2009) ISBN 3-900051-07-0

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strobl, C.: Statistical Issues in Machine Learning - Towards Reliable Split Selection and Variable Importance Measures. PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johnson, I., Abécassis, J., Charnomordic, B., Destercke, S., Thomopoulos, R. (2010). Making Ontology-Based Knowledge and Decision Trees Interact: An Approach to Enrich Knowledge and Increase Expert Confidence in Data-Driven Models. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics