Abstract
Risk analysis and management are important capabilities in intelligent information and knowledge systems. We present a new approach using directed graph based models for risk analysis and management. Our modelling approach is inspired by and builds on the two level approach of the Transferable Belief Model. The credal level for risk analysis and model construction uses beliefs in causal inference relations among the variables within a domain and a pignistic(betting) level for the decision making. The risk model at the credal level can be transformed into a probabilistic model through a pignistic transformation function. This paper focuses on model construction at the credal level. Our modelling approach captures expert knowledge in a formal and iterative fashion based on the Open World Assumption(OWA) in contrast to Bayesian Network based approaches for managing uncertainty associated with risks which assume all the domain knowledge and data have been captured before hand. As a result, our approach does not require complete knowledges and is well suited for modelling risk in dynamic changing environments where information and knowledge is gathered over time as decisions need to be taken. Its performance is related to the quality of the knowledge at hand at any given time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Oliver, R., Smith, J. (eds.): Influence diagrams, belief nets and decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1990)
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1988)
Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence (66), 191–234 (1994)
Aven, T.: Risk Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (2008)
Smets, P.: The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In: Gabbay, D.M., Smets, P. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 1, pp. 267–302. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1998)
Smets, P.: Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. In: Henrion, M., Shachter, R.D., Kanal, L.N., Lemmer, J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, North Holland, Amsterdam, vol. 5, pp. 29–40 (1990)
Lindstrom, S., Rabinowicz, W.: Conditionals and the ramsey test. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 3, pp. 147–188. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1998)
Zuk, O., Margel, S., Domany, E.: On the number of samples needed to learn the correct structure of a bayesian network. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, Arlington (2006)
Ramachandran, S.: Theory Refinement of Bayesian Networks with Hidden Variables. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, X., Williams, MA. (2010). A Graphical Model for Risk Analysis and Management. In: Bi, Y., Williams, MA. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15279-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15280-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)