The TAC SCM Prediction Challenge presents an opportunity for agents designed for the full TAC SCM game to compete solely on their ability to make predictions. Participants are presented with situations from actual TAC SCM games and are evaluated on their prediction accuracy in four categories: current and future computer prices, and current and future component prices. This paper introduces the Prediction Challenge and presents the results from 2007 along with an analysis of how the predictions of the participants compare to each other.


Current Component Price Error Future Computer Price Prediction Game Server 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Collins, J., Arunachalam, R., Sadeh, N., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., Janson, S.: The Supply Chain Management game for the 2007 Trading Agent Competition. Technical report (2006),
  2. 2.
    Pardoe, D., Stone, P.: An autonomous agent for supply chain management. In: Adomavicius, G., Gupta, A. (eds.) Handbooks in Information Systems Series: Business Computing. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiekintveld, C., Miller, J., Jordan, P.R., Callender, L.F., Wellman, M.P.: Forecasting market prices in a supply chain game. Submitted to Electronic Commerce Research Applications (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiekintveld, C., Wellman, M., Singh, S., Estelle, J., Vorobeychik, Y., Soni, V., Rudary, M.: Distributed feedback control for decision making on supply chains. In: Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benisch, M., Sardinha, A., Andrews, J., Sadeh, N.: Cmieux: Adaptive strategies for competitive supply chain trading. In: Eighth International Conference on Electronic Commerce (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burke, D.A., Brown, K.N., Hnich, B., Tarim, A.: Learning market prices for a real-time supply chain management trading agent. In: AAMAS 2006 Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis/Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benisch, M., Greenwald, A., Grypari, I., Lederman, R., Naroditskiy, V., Tschantz, M.: Botticelli: A supply chain management agent. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), vol. 3, pp. 1174–1181 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Pardoe
    • 1
  • Peter Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesThe University of Texas at Austin 

Personalised recommendations