Abstract
Macroeconomic crises are events marked by “broken promises” that shatter the expectations that many agents had entertained about their economic prospects and wealth positions. Crises lead to reappraisals of the views of the world upon which agents had based their expectations, plans and decisions, and to a reconsideration of theories and models on the part of analysts. A crisis triggers widespread efforts of abduction in search of new hypothesis and explanations. In this paper we will explore, in particular, the abductions that analysts may apply after a crisis and see how they reveal the prevalence of “wrong” abductions at the onset of the crisis. In order to carry out this exercise, we study the general role of abduction in economic analysis, both theoretical and practical. Economic theory generally proceeds by constructing models, that is, mental schemes based on mental experiments. They are often written in mathematical language but, apart from their formal expression, they use metaphors, analogies and pieces of intuition to motivate their assumptions and to give support to their conclusions. We try to capture all these elements in a formal scheme and apply the ensuing model of abduction to the analysis of macroeconomic crises.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aliseda, A.: Logics in scientific siscovery. Foundations of Science 9, 339–363 (2004)
Aliseda, A.: Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)
Barwise, J., Hammer, E.: Diagrams and the concept of logical system. In: Allwein, G., Barwise, J. (eds.) Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, pp. 49–78. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)
Boersema, D.: Peirce on explanation. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17, 224–236 (2003)
Brandenburger, A.: The power of paradox: Some recent developments in interactive epistemology. International Journal of Game Theory 35, 465–492 (2007)
Caballero, R.J., Farhi, E., Gourinchas, P.O.: Financial Crash, Commodity Prices and Global Imbalances. NBER Working Paper 14521 (2008)
Cochrane, J.H.: Lessons from the financial crisis. Regulation 32, 34–37 (2010)
Cole, H., Ohanian, L.: The Great Depression in the US from a neoclassical perspective. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 23, 2–24 (1999)
Cresto, E.: Creer, inferir y aceptar: una defensa de la inferencia a la mejor explicación apta para incrédulos. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía 28, 201–229 (2002)
Cresto, E.: Inferring to the Best Explanation: A Decision-Theoretic Approach. Ph. D. Thesis, Columbia University (2006)
Day, T., Kincaid, H.: Putting inference to the best explanation in its place. Synthese 98, 271–295 (1994)
Devlin, K.: The Joy of Sets. Springer, New York (1993)
Frigg, R.: Models in Science, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006), http://plato.stanford.edu/
Graham, R., Spencer, J., Rothschild, B.: Ramsey Theory. Wiley and Sons, New York (1990)
Haack, S.: Two fallibilists in search of truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 51, 73–84 (1977)
Harman, G.: The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review 74, 88–95 (1965)
Hart, O., Zingales, L.: How to avoid a financial crisis, Working Paper, Chicago University (2009)
Heymann, D.: Macroeconomics of broken promises. In: Farmer, R. (ed.) Macroeconomics in the Small and the Large, pp. 74–98. Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2008)
Kane, E.: Incentive Roots of the Securitization Crisis (2009), http://www.voxeu.org
Kehoe, T., Prescott, E. (eds.): Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis (2007)
Keynes, J.M.: A treatise on probability (1921). In: The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes VIII, MacMillan, London (1973)
Keynes, J.M.: The general theory and after: Part II. Defence and Development. In: The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV. MacMillan, London (1973)
Kolany, A.: On the logic of hypergraphs. In: Mundici, D., Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A. (eds.) KGC 1993. LNCS, vol. 713, pp. 231–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Krantz, D., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement, vol. I. Academic Press, New York (1971)
Leijonhufvud, A.: Stabilities and instabilities in the macroeconomy (2009), http://www.voxeu.org
Levesque, H.: Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence 23, 155–212 (1984)
Levi, I.: Decisions and Revisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)
Levi, I.: Inductive expansions and non-monotonic reasoning. In: Rott, H., Williams, M. (eds.) Belief Revision, pp. 7–56. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)
Lipton, P.: Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, London (2004)
Marostica, A.: Abduction: The creative process. In: Gorna, R., Hausden, B., Posner, R. (eds.) Signs, Search and Communication: Semiotic Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 134–150. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1993)
Morgan, M., Morrison, M.: Models as mediating instruments. In: Morgan, M., Morrison, M. (eds.) Models as Mediators, pp. 10–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Nersessian, N.: How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In: Giere, R. (ed.) Cognitive Models of Science, pp. 5–22. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1992)
Niiniluoto, I.: Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science 66 (suppl.), S436–S451 (1999)
Obstfeld, M., Rogoff, K.: Global imbalances and the financial crisis: Products of common causes. Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (2009)
O’Driscoll, G.: Money and the present crisis. Cato Journal 29, 167–186 (2009)
Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers Vols. 1–8. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., Burks, A. (eds.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931–1958)
Rescher, N.: Peirce’s Philosophy of Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1977)
Shoenfield, J.: Mathematical Logic. Addison-Wesley, New York (1967)
Simon, H.: On judging the plausibility of theories. In: Van Rootselaar, B., Staal, J. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, vol. III, pp. 439–459. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1968)
Simon, H.: Computer modeling of scientific and mathematical discovery processes. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Association (New Series) 11, 247–262 (1984)
Stigum, B.: Toward a Formal Science of Economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
Schiller, R.: The Subprime Solution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)
Taylor, J.: The financial crisis and the policy response: An empirical analysis of what went wrong. Working Paper, Stanford University (2008)
Thagard, P.: The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy 75, 76–92 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crespo, R.F., Tohmé, F., Heymann, D. (2010). Abducing the Crisis. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15222-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15223-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)