Advertisement

Modeling the Epistemological Multipolarity of Semiotic Objects

  • Zdzisław Wa̧sik
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 314)

Abstract

For practitioners of semiotics the most controversial questions constitute the status and nature of the semiotic object equalized with the sign separated from its object(s) of reference or encompassing its object(s) reference, i.e., whether the sign is a unilateral entity or a plurilateral unit comprised of interrelated constituents, or a relation (a network of relations) between those constituents. Further questions refer to the manifestations of signs, namely, whether they appear in material or spiritual (corporeal or intelligible, physical or mental), concrete or abstract, real or ideal forms of being, being examined subjectively or objectively in their extraorganismic or intraorganismic manifestations. Accordingly, signs are approached either extra- or introspectively, through individual tokens or general types, occurring in the realm of man only; in the realm of all living systems, or in the universe of creatures, extraterrestrial and divine in nature. These varieties of sign conceptions exhibit not only differences in terminology but also in the formation of their visual presentations. Bearing in mind the need for their analysis and comparison, the practitioner of semiotic disciplines has to find a parameter or a matrix that would contain features and components characteristic for particular approaches to their forms of being and manifestation. Within the framework of this article, the adept readers will be provided with a theory-and-method related outlooks on the token and type relationships between the mental and concrete existence modes of semiotic objects and their objects of reference. Having reviewed all hitherto known sign conceptions, it will be demonstrated how their two main components, the signans and signatum, may be modeled with their collective and individual properties as oscillating between the possible four epistemological positions: logical positivism, rational empiricism, empirical rationalism, and absolute rationalism.

Keywords

Ontological Status Cultural Object Epistemological Position Linguistic Sign Triadic Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Augustine, St. [Augustinus, Aurelius (Hipponensis)], On Christian Doctrine. In: Robertson, Jr. D.W. (ed. & trans.) De doctrina Christiana, Liber secundus, I. 1, Liberal Arts Press, New York, [397] (1958)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bühler, K.: Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. In: D.F. Goodwin (trans.) Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia (1990 [1934])Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frege, G.: Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50 (1892)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guiraud, P.: Semiology. Gross, G. (trans.) Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston. La sémiologie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France (1975 [1971])Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hjelmslev, L.: Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. F.J. Whitfield (trans.). Waverly Press, Baltomore. Omkring sprogte-oriens grundlaeggelse. Festskrift udgivet af Københavns. Universitet. København (1953 [1943])Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamb, S.M.: Language and Illusion. Toward a Cognitive Theory of Language. Rice University, Houston TX (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lyons, J.: Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1968)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Łukaszewski, W.: Pojęcia i systemy pojęciowe z psychologicznego punktu widzenia (Concepts and conceptual systems from a psychological viewpoint). In: Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Studia Linguistica I, vol. 197, pp. 73–95 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ockham, W.: Summa logicae. In: Boehner, P. (ed.) Franciscan Institute, St. Bonaventure, NY. St. Bonaventure University, [ca 1323]) (Ockham’s “Theory of Terms”: Part I of the Summa Logicae, Loux, M. J. trans. & introd. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press (1951)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A.: The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of a Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., London (1923)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peirce, C.S.: Division of signs. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (eds.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Elements of Logic, 2.28, vol. 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1932 [1897])Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Saussure, F.: Course in General Linguistics. W. Baskin (trans.). Philosophical Library, New York Cours de linguistique générale. Ch. Bally, A. Sechehaye (in coop. with) A. Riedlinger (eds.). Payot, Lausanne & Paris (1959 [1916])Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wa̧sik, Z.: The consequences of epistemological positions for the foundations of Linguistic sign theories. In: Kardela, H., Persson, G. (eds.) New Trends in Semantics and Lexicography. Proceedings of the International Conference at Kazimierz, December 13-15, 1995, pp. 209–217. Swedish Science Press, Umeå (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wa̧sik, Z.: An Outline for Lectures on the Epistemology of Semiotics. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wa̧sik, Z.: Epistemological Perspectives on Linguistic Semiotics. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, et al. (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wa̧sik, Z.: Between praxeological and axiological semiotics in the cultural sphere of intersubjective meanings. Chinese Semiotic Studies 2, 124–134 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zdzisław Wa̧sik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Linguistic Semiotics and Communicology, Philological School of Higher Education in Wrocław, Kolegium Karkonoskie in Jelenia Góra and Department of Linguistic Semiotics, Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations