Advertisement

The Role of Agency Detection in the Invention of Supernatural Beings

An Abductive Approach
  • Tommaso Bertolotti
  • Lorenzo Magnani
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 314)

Abstract

Over the last decade, a multidisciplinary approach (merging cognitive science, anthropology and evolutionary psychology) has stressed the fundamental importance of cognitive constraints concerning the complex phenomenon defined as “religion”. The main feature is the predominant presence of belief in agent-concepts that display a strong counterfactual nature, in spite of a minor degree of counterintuitiveness. Consistently with the major trend in cognitive science, we contend that agents populating religious beliefs were generated by the same processes involved to infer the presence of ordinary agents. Coherently with the Peircean framework, in which all cognitive performance is considered as a sign-mediated activity, our main point is that those processes of agency detection are characterized at all levels - from the less conscious to the higher ones - by the inferential procedure called abduction. Hence, the very invention of supernatural agents seems to be the result of a particular series of abductive processes that served some other purposes before (i.e. the detection of predators and preys) and whose output was coherent with that of other abductive patterns. Eventually, they would be externalized and recapitulated in the well-known figures of deities, spirits, and so on: thoughts concerning supernatural beings, at first rather vague, were embodied in material culture with the result of fixing them in more stable and sharable representations that could be manipulated and acquired back in the mind in the definitive form.

Keywords

Material Culture External Representation Inattentional Blindness Private Speech Agency Detection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atran, S.: In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atran, S., Medin, D.: The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett, H.C.: Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity. Mind & Language 20(3), 259–287 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrett, H.C., Kurzban, R.: Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. Psychological Review 113(3), 628–647 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett, J.: Cognitive science, religion and theology. In: Schloss, J., Murray, M.J. (eds.) The Believing Primate, pp. 76–99. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bedford, G.O.: Biology and ecology of the Phasmatodea. Annual Review of Entomology 23(1), 125–149 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyer, P.: Religion Explained. Vintage U.K. Random House, London (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carruthers, P.: Simple heuristics meet massive modularity. In: Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., Stich, S. (eds.) The Innate Mind. Culture and Cognition, vol. 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clayton, S., Opotow, S. (eds.): Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dennet, D.: Breaking the Spell. VIKING, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dettner, K., Liepert, C.: Chemical mimicry and camouflage. Annual Review of Entomology 39(1), 129–154 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixon, T.: Science and Religion: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Driver, J., Spence, C.: Crossmodal attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8(2), 245–253 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dundes, A.: Introduction. In: Dundes, A. (ed.) Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth, pp. 1–3. University of California Press, Berkley (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flinn, M.V., Geary, D.C., Ward, C.V.: Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior 26, 10–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fodor, J.: The Modularity of the Mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fodor, J.: The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gebhard, U., Nevers, P., Bilmann-Mahecha, E.: Moralizing trees: anthropomorphism and identity in children’s relationships to nature. In: Clayton, S., Opotow, S. (eds.) Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, pp. 91–111. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gunter, R.: The absolute threshold for vision in the cat. Journal of Physiology 114, 8–15 (1951)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Humphrey, N.: The Mind Made Flesh. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacob, P., Jeannerod, M.: Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis-Williams, D.: The Mind in the Cave. Thames and Hudson, London (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnani, L.: Mimetic minds. In: Loula, A., Gudwin, R., Queiroz, J. (eds.) Artificial Cognition Systems, pp. 327–257. Idea Group Publishing, London (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magnani, L.: Animal abduction. Studies in Computational Intelligence 64, 3–28 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Métraux, A.: South American Thunderbirds. The Journal of American Folklore 57(224), 132–135 (1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer, D.R., Miles, R.C., Ratoosh, P.: Absence of color vision in cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 17(3), 289–294 (1954)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mithen, S.: The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion, and Science. Thames and Hudson, London (1996)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mithen, S.: Handaxes and ice age carvings: hard evidence for the evolution of consciousness. In: Hameroff, A., Kaszniak, A., Chalmers, D. (eds.) Toward a Science of Consciousness III: The Third Tucson Discussions and Debates, pp. 281–296. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neudecker, S.: Eye camouflage and false eyespots: chaetodontid responses to predators. Environmental Biology of Fishes 25(1-3), 143–157 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931-1958), Vols. 1-6, Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (eds.); vols. 7-8, Burks, A.W (ed)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1992-1998); vol. 1 (1867-1893) ed. by N. Houser and C. Kloesel; vol. 2 (1893-1913) ed. by the Peirce Edition ProjectzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pettypiece, C.E., Goodale, M.A., Culham, J.C.: Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict. Experimental Brain Research 201(4), 863–873 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phelps, E.A., Ling, S., Carrasco, M.: Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science 17(4), 292–299 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Purser, B.: Jungle Bugs: Masters of Camouflage and Mimicry. Firefly Books, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raftopoulos, A.: Is perception informationally encapsulated? The issue of theory-ladenness of perception. Cognitive Science 25, 423–451 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raftopoulos, A.: Reentrant pathways and the theory-ladenness of perception. Philosophy of Science 68, S187–S189 (2001), Proceedings of PSA 2000 Biennal MeetingGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reagan, A.B., Walters, L.V.W.: Tales from the Hoh and Quileute. The Journal of American Folklore 46(182), 297–346 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schloss, J., Murray, M.J. (eds.): The Believing Primate. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scott, S.L.: “They don’t have to live by the old traditions”: saintly men, sinner women, and an Appalachian Pentecostal revival. American Ethnologist 21(2), 227–224 (1994)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059–1074 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sperber, D., Hirschfeld, L.A.: The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1), 40–46 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thesen, T., Vibell, J.F., Calvert, G.A., Österbauer, R.A.: Neuroimaging of multisensory processing in vision, audition, touch, and olfaction. Cognitive Processing 5(2), 84–93 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thom, R.: Stabilité Structurelle et Morphogénèse. Essai d’une théorie générale des modèles. InterEditions, Paris (1972). Translated by D. H. Fowler, Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thom, R.: Modèles mathématiques de la morphogenèse. Christian Bourgois, Paris (1980); Translated by W. M. Brookes and D. Rand, Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis, Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1983)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tooby, J., Cosmides, L.: The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. (eds.) The Adapted Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wilson, D.S.: Darwin’s Cathedral. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London (2002)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Woods, J.: Seductions and Shortcuts: Error in the Cognitive Economy (2010) (Forthcoming)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tommaso Bertolotti
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Magnani
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
  2. 2.Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouP.R. China

Personalised recommendations