Co-production and Co-creation: Creative Practice in Social Inclusion

  • Atau Tanaka
  • Lalya Gaye
  • Ranald Richardson
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 333)

Abstract

We apply techniques drawn from interactive media art in fieldwork for social inclusion. Advanced mobile media and grassroots DIY techniques are used to bring creative practice with digital media into community based outreach work. We use these techniques in a participatory context that encourages the co-production of cultural output. We triangulate across artistic practice, technology engineering, and the social sciences to leverage methods from digital media art practice in contexts that result in social innovation.

Keywords

interactive music social inclusion social innovation co-production of knowledge triangulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Schwarz, H.-P.: Media-Art-History: Media Museum. Prestel, Munich (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grau, O.: MediaArtHistories. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reisinger, G., Daniels, D.: Net Pioneers 1.0: Contextualizing Early Net-Based Art. Sternberg Press, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodge, C., Jerse, T.A.: Computer Music: Synthesis, Composition, and Performance. Schirmer Books, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Risset, J.-C.: Introductory Catalogue of Computer Synthesized Sounds. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill (1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poupyrev, I., Lyons, M.J., Fels, S., Blaine, T.: New Interfaces For Musical Expression Workshop. In: CHI 2001 Extended Abstracts (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silver, H.: Policies to combat social exclusion: A French-British comparison. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compaine, B.M.: The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warschauer, M.: Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz, J., Rice, R.: Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Digital Britain. Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dench, G., Flower, T., Gavron, K.: Young at Eighty. Carcanet, Manchester (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Social Inclusion through the Digital Economy, http://www.side.ac.uk
  14. 14.
    Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-Centered Design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.Y., Smith, P.W., Carey, T.: A survey of user-centered design practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 471–478. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jasanoff, S.: States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. Routledge, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., et al.: The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oudshoorn, N., Pinch, T.: How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users And Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leadbeater, C.: We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production: The Power of Mass Creativity. Profile Books, London (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jo, K., Tanaka, A.: The Music Participates. In: Schroeder, F. (ed.) Performing Technology: User Content and the New Digital Media. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arnstein, S.R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mackay, W.E., Fayard, A.-L.: HCI, Natural Science and Design: A Framework for Triangulation Across Disciplines. In: Proc. DIS 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Unterfrauner, E., Marschalek, I.: ICT and Mobile Phones as Resources for Marginalised Youth. In: Proc. Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reality Jockey, http://www.rjdj.me
  25. 25.
    Gaye, L., Mazé, R., Holmquist, L.E.: Sonic City: The Urban Environment as a Musical Interface. In: Proc. NIME (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atau Tanaka
    • 1
  • Lalya Gaye
    • 1
  • Ranald Richardson
    • 2
  1. 1.Culture Lab 
  2. 2.Centre for Urban Regional Development StudiesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations