Advertisement

Towards an Architecture for Self-regulating Agents: A Case Study in International Trade

  • Brigitte Burgemeestre
  • Joris Hulstijn
  • Yao-Hua Tan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6069)

Abstract

Norm-enforcement models applied in human societies may serve as an inspiration for the design of multi-agent systems. Models for norm-enforcement in multi-agent systems often focus either on the intra- or inter-agent level. We propose a combined approach to identify objectives for an architecture for self-regulating agents. In this paper we assess how changes on the inter-agent level affect the intra-agent level and how a generic BDI architecture IRMA can be adapted for self-regulation. The approach is validated with a case study of AEO certification, a European wide customs initiative to secure the supply chain while facilitating international trade.

Keywords

Self-regulation agent architectures compliance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2), 157–206 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12, 71–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braithwaite, J.: Enforced self-regulation: a new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan law review 80, 1466–1506 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bratman, M.E., Israel, D., Pollack, M.: Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. In: Cummins, R., Pollock, J.L. (eds.) Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, pp. 1–22. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bresciani, P., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J.: Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8, 203–236 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., van der Torre, L.: Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4), 431–450 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burgemeestre, C.B., Liu, J., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.: Early Requirements Engineering for e-Customs Decision Support: Assessing Overlap in Mental Models. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE Forum, pp. 31–36 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burgemeestre, C.B., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.: Agent Architectures for Compliance. In: Aldewereld, H. (ed.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 68–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    COSO enterprise risk management framework, http://www.coso.org
  11. 11.
    Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    European Commission: AEO Guidelines, TAXUD/2006/1450 (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/policy_issues/
  13. 13.
    Hindriks, K., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Satisfying maintenance goals. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4897, pp. 86–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meneguzzi, F., Luck, M.: Norm-based behaviour modification in BDI agents. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’09), Budapest, Hungary, pp. 177–184 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), San Mateo CA (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rees, J.: Self-regulation: An Effective Alternative to Direct Regulation by OSHA? Policy Studies Journal 16(3), 602–614 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sadiq, S.W., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, E.K.S.: Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements engineering, pp. 226–235 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigitte Burgemeestre
    • 1
  • Joris Hulstijn
    • 1
  • Yao-Hua Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.PGS IT Audit, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationVrije Universiteit 
  2. 2.Department of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of Technology 

Personalised recommendations