Advertisement

Directing Status Messages to Their Audience in Online Communities

  • Milan Stankovic
  • Alexandre Passant
  • Philippe Laublet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6069)

Abstract

Social interactions have become an important element of today’s Web through sites like Social Networks and other online communities. In this paper we focus on a particular aspect of the ”Social Web” – the exchange of status messages (short text messages usually broadcasted to a large audience). We investigate the nature of the status message sharing phenomenon and the issues that surround it by the means of a qualitative user study. The results suggest the need to introduce the notion of audience of a status message in the broadcasting in order to prevent the issues of ”Gap of Understanding”, ”Lack of Significance” and ”Privacy”. In the second part of the paper we present the requirements for a system that would overcome those issues, and seek the concrete solutions in the emerging ”Semantic Web” technologies. We present a way how ”Semantic Web” ontologies and rules could be used to address the problem of directing status messages to their intended audience. Particularly we show how semantic descriptions of status messages and their intended audiences can be beneficially coupled with the existing distributed data about users to direct status messages to their intended recipients.

Keywords

Online Presence Virtual Social Networks Semantic Web 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, A.: Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13, 145–204 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lenhart, A., Fox, S.: Twitter and status updating. Report of Pew Internet and American Life Project (February 12, 2009), http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Twitterand-status-updating.aspx
  3. 3.
    Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stankovic, M.: Faceted Online Presence – A Semantic Web Approach. Master’s Thesis. Université Paris-Sud XI, Orsay, France (2009), http://milstan.net/papers/masters.pdf
  5. 5.
    Ladegaard, H.J.: Audience design revisited: persons, roles, and power relations in speech interactions. Language and Communication 15, 89–101 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (May 2001), http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web&print=true
  7. 7.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Design Issues: Linked Data (2006), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  8. 8.
    Stankovic, M.: Modeling Online Presence. In: Proceedings of the First Social Data on the Web Workshop, Karlsruhe, Germany (2008), http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-405/paper9.pdf
  9. 9.
    Breslin, J.G., Harth, A., Bojars, U., Decker, S.: Towards Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 500–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quilitz, B., Leser, U.: Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 524–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), http://www.eswc2008.org/final-pdfs-for-web-site/qpII-2.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/
  12. 12.
    Hogan, A., Harth, A., Polleres, A.: Scalable Authoritative OWL Reasoning for the Web. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(2), 49–90 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boley, H., Hallmark, G., Kifer, M., Pasche, A., Pollares, A., Reynolds, D.R.: RIF Core (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/
  14. 14.
    Passant, A., Kärger, P., Hausenblas, M., Olmedilla, D., Pollares, A., Decker, S.: Enabling Trust and Privacy on the Social Web. In: Proceedings of W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networks, Barcelona (January 15-16, 2009), http://www.w3.org/2008/09/msnws/papers/trustprivacy.html
  15. 15.
    Toninelli, A., Khushraj, D., Lassila, O., Montanari, R.: Towards Socially Aware Mobile Phones. In: Proceedings of the First Social Data on the Web Workshop, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Karlsruhe, Germany, October 27 (2008) ISSN 1613-0073, http://ftp1.de.freebsd.org/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-405/paper1.pdf
  16. 16.
    Sadeh, N., Gandon, F., Kwon, O.B.: Ambient Intelligence and Pervasive Computing. In: Vasilakos, T., Pedrycz, W. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence: The MyCampus Experience. ArTech House, Norwood (2006), http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sadeh/Publications/More%20Complete%20List/Ambient%20Intelligence%20Tech%20Report%20final.pdf
  17. 17.
    Kassoff, M., Petrie, C., Zen, L.M., Genesereth, M.: Semantic Email Addressing: Sending Email to People, Not Strings. In: AAAI 2006 Fall Symposium on Integrating Reasoning into Everyday Applications (2006), www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2006/FS-06-04/FS06-04-004.pdf
  18. 18.
    Passant, A., Hastrup, T., Bojars, U., Breslin, J.,, M.: A Semantic Web and Distributed Approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Tenerife, Spain, June 02 (2008) ISSN 1613-0073, www.semanticscripting.org/SFSW2008/papers/11.pdf
  19. 19.
    Story, H.: FOAF & SSL: creating a global decentralized authentication protocol. In: W3C Workshop on the Future of Social Networking, Barcelona, Spain, January 15-16 (2009), blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/foaf_ssl_creating_a_global

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milan Stankovic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandre Passant
    • 3
  • Philippe Laublet
    • 1
  1. 1.LaLICUniversité Paris–SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.HypiosParisFrance
  3. 3.Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of Ireland UI-GalwayGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations