On the Nature and Formal Analysis of Indexical Presuppositions

  • Igor Yanovich
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6284)


This paper is divided into an empirical part and a theoretical part. The empirical part rediscovers a peculiar creature which was found by [Cooper, 1983] and then plunged back into the abyss of oblivion — indexical presuppositions, a special kind of “presuppositions” which can only, according to Cooper, be satisfied in the actual world. Cooper claimed that presuppositions of the gender features of free anaphoric pronouns induce such non-projecting “presuppositions”. I enlarge the empirical scope of the discovery by showing that, first, indexical presuppositions are induced by gender features of all anaphoric pronouns, not just the free ones; and second, that their satisfaction requirements are more complicated than simple “satisfaction in the actual world only.” On the theoretical side, I sketch three possible analyses of indexical presuppositions. The first one relies on direct copying of features from the antecedent, but meets certain serious problems. More work is needed in order to figure out if that theory can actually be worked out. The second theory employs a very complex constraint on choosing the name for the world variable of the pronoun, crucially using both syntax of the sentence and the model against which it is interpreted. The third one, in a sense the least conventional of all three, moves all the work to semantics, and analyzes indexical presuppositions as conditions on a rich structure of worlds, somewhat doubling the structure of embedding in the formula, which replaces the standard single possible world evaluation parameter.


Actual World Gender Feature Gender Property Attitude Verb Belief World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Cooper, 1983]
    Cooper, R.: Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 21. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Cresswell, 1990]
    Cresswell, M.: Entities and Indices. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Elbourne, 2005]
    Elbourne, P.: Situations and individuals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  4. [Enç, 1981]
    Enç, M.: Tense without Scope: An Analysis of Nouns as Indexicals. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin (1981)Google Scholar
  5. [Gabbay, 1974]
    Gabbay, D.M.: Tense logics and the tenses in english. In: Moravcsik, J. (ed.) Logic and Philosophy for Linguists, Mouton, The Hague (1974)Google Scholar
  6. [Geurts, 1999]
    Geurts, B.: Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  7. [Kamp, 1971]
    Kamp, H.: Formal properties of “now”. Theoria 37, 227–273 (1971)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [Kaplan, 1989]
    Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)Google Scholar
  9. [Keshet, 2008]
    Keshet, E.: Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of the De re/De dicto Distinction. PhD thesis, MIT (2008)Google Scholar
  10. [Kusumoto, 2005]
    Kusumoto, K.: On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural Language Semantics 13, 317–357 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Percus, 2000]
    Percus, O.: Constraints on some other variables in syntax. Natural Language Semantics 8, 173–229 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [Saarinen, 1978]
    Saarinen, E.: Backward-looking operators in tense logic and in natural language. In: Hintikka, J., Niiniluoto, I., Saarinen, E. (eds.) Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, pp. 341–367. Reidel, Dordrecht (1978)Google Scholar
  13. [Schlenker, 2003]
    Schlenker, P.: A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Schlenker, 2005]
    Schlenker, P.: Ontological symmetry in language: A brief manifesto. Mind and Language 21(4), 504–539 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [van der Sandt, 1992]
    van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [Vlach, 1973]
    Vlach, F.: ‘Now’ and ‘Then’: A Formal Study in the Logic of Tense Anaphora. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Yanovich
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations