An Aspect-Oriented Framework for Event Capture and Usability Evaluation

  • Slava Shekh
  • Sue Tyerman
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 69)


Recent work in usability evaluation has focused on automatically capturing and analysing user interface events. However, automated techniques typically require modification of the underlying software, preventing non-programmers from using these techniques. In addition, capturing events requires each event source to be modified and since these sources may be spread throughout the system, maintaining the event capture functionality can become a very arduous task. Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) is a programming paradigm that separates the concerns or behaviours of a system into discrete aspects, allowing all event capture to be contained within a single aspect. Consequently, the use of AOP for usability evaluation is currently an area of research interest, but there is a lack of a general framework. This paper describes the development of an AOP-based usability evaluation framework that can be dynamically configured to capture specific events in an application.


Aspect-oriented programming Usability evaluation Human-computer interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hilbert, D.M., Redmiles, D.F.: Extracting Usability Information from User Interface Events. ACM Computing Surveys 32(4), 384–421 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ivory, M.Y., Hearst, M.A.: The State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys 33(4), 470–516 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tao, Y.: Capturing User Interface Events with Aspects. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4553, pp. 1170–1179. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Low, T.: Designing, Modelling and Implementing a Toolkit for Aspect-oriented Tracing (TAST). In: AOSD 2002 Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Modeling with UML (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avgustinov, P., Bodden, E., Hajiyev, E., Hendren, L., Lhotak, O., Moor, O., Ongkingco, N., Sereni, D., Sittampalam, G., Tibble, J., Verbaere, M.: Aspects for Trace Monitoring. In: Formal Approaches to Testing and Runtime Verification, pp. 20–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The AspectJ Project,
  7. 7.
    Hartman, G.S., Bass, L.: Logging Events Crossing Architectural Boundaries. In: Costabile, M.F., Paternó, F. (eds.) INTERACT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3585, pp. 823–834. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tao, Y.: Toward Computer-Aided Usability Evaluation for Evolving Interactive Software. In: ECOOP 2007 Workshop on Reflection, AOP and Meta-Data for Software Evolution. University of Magdeburg (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tarta, A.M., Moldovan, G.S.: Automatic Usability Evaluation Using AOP. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, pp. 84–89. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tarby, J., Ezzedine, H., Rouillard, J., Tran, C.D., Laporte, P., Kolski, C.: Traces Using Aspect Oriented Programming and Interactive Agent-Based Architecture for Early Usability Evaluation: Basic Principles and Comparison. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4550, pp. 632–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Information Systems Laboratory,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slava Shekh
    • 1
  • Sue Tyerman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of South AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations