Skip to main content

Reynolds-Stress and Scalar Flux Transport Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tackling Turbulent Flows in Engineering
  • 1718 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents modeled forms of the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equations. It is shown that the modeling of several terms of the exact Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equation is far more complex than that of the turbulence kinetic energy equation. As a result the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport models do not always produce more accurate results compared to the two-equation models. Finally the advantages and disadvantages of such models are compared with those of the two-equation models by means of examples from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen HC, Patel VC (1988) Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA J 26(6):641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HC, Jang YJ, Han JC (2000) Computation of heat transfer in rotating two-pass square channels by a second-moment closure model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:1603–1616

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Daly BJ, Harlow FH (1970) Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:2634–2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos GA, Neubauer J, Sharma VC, Vallet I (2002) Improved prediction of turbomachinery flows using near-wall Reynolds-stress model. Trans ASME J Turbomach 124:86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjalic K (2005) Will RANS survive LES? A view of perspectives. ASME J Fluids Eng 127(5):831–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjalic K, Launder BE (1976) Contribution towards a Reynolds stress closure for low-Reynolds-number turbulence. J Fluid Mech 74(4):593–610

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjalic K, Hdzic I, Jakirlic S (1999) Modelling of turbulent wall flows subjected to strong pressure variations. ASME J Fluids Eng 121:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia R, Sundén B, Faghri M (2007) A new low Reynolds-stress transport model for heat transfer and fluid in engineering applications. Trans ASME J Heat Transf 129:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder BE (1989) Second-moment closure: present and future? Int J Heat Fluid Flow 10(4):282–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68(3):537–566

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lien FS, Leschziner MA (1994) Assessment of turbulent transport models including non-linear RNG eddy viscosity formulation and second-moment closure. Comp Fluids 23:983–1004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak M, Dewan A, Dass AK (2006) Computational prediction of a slightly heated turbulent rectangular jet discharged into a narrow channel crossflow using two different turbulence models. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49(21–22):3914–3928

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodi W (1976) A new algebraic relation for calculating Reynolds stresses. ZAMM 56:219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi R, Philips DA, Iaccarino G (2009) Numerical simulation of scalar dispersion in separated flows using algebraic flux models. Turbul Heat Mass Transf 6:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Said NM, Mhiri H, Bournot H (2008) Experimental and numerical modelling of the three-dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. J Wind Eng Ind Aero 96:471–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speziale CG, Sarkar S, Gatski S (1991) Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. J Fluid Mech 227:245–272

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers MJ, Hanjalic K, Passchier DM, Henkes RAWM (2007) Computations of a turbulent wake in a strong adverse pressure gradient. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:418–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JH, Johnson BV, Kopper FC (1991) Heat transfer in rotating serpentine passage with smooth walls. J Turbomach 113(3):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox DC (2006) Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc, La Canada, CA 91011, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anupam Dewan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dewan, A. (2011). Reynolds-Stress and Scalar Flux Transport Model. In: Tackling Turbulent Flows in Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14767-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14767-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14766-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14767-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics