Abstract
This chapter presents modeled forms of the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equations. It is shown that the modeling of several terms of the exact Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport equation is far more complex than that of the turbulence kinetic energy equation. As a result the Reynolds stress and scalar flux transport models do not always produce more accurate results compared to the two-equation models. Finally the advantages and disadvantages of such models are compared with those of the two-equation models by means of examples from the literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen HC, Patel VC (1988) Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation. AIAA J 26(6):641–648
Chen HC, Jang YJ, Han JC (2000) Computation of heat transfer in rotating two-pass square channels by a second-moment closure model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:1603–1616
Daly BJ, Harlow FH (1970) Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids 13:2634–2649
Gerolymos GA, Neubauer J, Sharma VC, Vallet I (2002) Improved prediction of turbomachinery flows using near-wall Reynolds-stress model. Trans ASME J Turbomach 124:86–99
Hanjalic K (2005) Will RANS survive LES? A view of perspectives. ASME J Fluids Eng 127(5):831–839
Hanjalic K, Launder BE (1976) Contribution towards a Reynolds stress closure for low-Reynolds-number turbulence. J Fluid Mech 74(4):593–610
Hanjalic K, Hdzic I, Jakirlic S (1999) Modelling of turbulent wall flows subjected to strong pressure variations. ASME J Fluids Eng 121:57–64
Jia R, Sundén B, Faghri M (2007) A new low Reynolds-stress transport model for heat transfer and fluid in engineering applications. Trans ASME J Heat Transf 129:434–440
Launder BE (1989) Second-moment closure: present and future? Int J Heat Fluid Flow 10(4):282–300
Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W (1975) Progress in the development of Reynolds stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech 68(3):537–566
Lien FS, Leschziner MA (1994) Assessment of turbulent transport models including non-linear RNG eddy viscosity formulation and second-moment closure. Comp Fluids 23:983–1004
Pathak M, Dewan A, Dass AK (2006) Computational prediction of a slightly heated turbulent rectangular jet discharged into a narrow channel crossflow using two different turbulence models. Int J Heat Mass Transf 49(21–22):3914–3928
Rodi W (1976) A new algebraic relation for calculating Reynolds stresses. ZAMM 56:219
Rossi R, Philips DA, Iaccarino G (2009) Numerical simulation of scalar dispersion in separated flows using algebraic flux models. Turbul Heat Mass Transf 6:1–12
Said NM, Mhiri H, Bournot H (2008) Experimental and numerical modelling of the three-dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. J Wind Eng Ind Aero 96:471–502
Speziale CG, Sarkar S, Gatski S (1991) Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. J Fluid Mech 227:245–272
Tummers MJ, Hanjalic K, Passchier DM, Henkes RAWM (2007) Computations of a turbulent wake in a strong adverse pressure gradient. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:418–428
Wagner JH, Johnson BV, Kopper FC (1991) Heat transfer in rotating serpentine passage with smooth walls. J Turbomach 113(3):321–330
Wilcox DC (2006) Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc, La Canada, CA 91011, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dewan, A. (2011). Reynolds-Stress and Scalar Flux Transport Model. In: Tackling Turbulent Flows in Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14767-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14767-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14766-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14767-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)