Abstract
Transonic flow, as a special case of compressible flow past two and three dimensional objects is considered. First, local linearization approach for steady thin airfoil theory is introduced to obtain approximate analytical solutions. Then, unsteady analytical solutions are provided for simple harmonically heaving-plunging and/or pitching airfoils. Numerical solutions to full non-linear potential flow past shockless airfoils are also given. Furthermore, comparisons of the surface pressure distributions for the conventional and the supercritical airfoils are provided and the significance of the supercritical airfoils is discussed. The aerodynamic performance of supercritical airfoils at off-design conditions is also given. A general approach to the unsteady transonic aerodynamics is given in terms of low transonic, high transonic and low supersonic considerations. The differences among the three are discussed with emphasis on the real and imaginary parts of the surface pressure distributions. The ‘shock doublet’ concept and its significance for the low transonic case are also provided. The shock related transonic phenomena such as flutter, buffeting and aileron buzz are briefly mentioned. The viscous effects on the transonic aerodynamics are considered and the concept of ‘transonic dip’ and its effect on the onset of buffeting is provided. Characteristics for the enveloping curves of the separation points, critical Mach numbers, drag divergence and the onset of buffeting with respect to the lift vs. Mach number are presented. Steady transonic flow over thin wings is provided with its historical development including a pioneering computational work involving the Navier–Stokes solutions over Wing-C. Unsteady transonic considerations for the finite wings are provided for the representative wings for which the measurements are given by AGARD as data bases. Finally, wing-body interactions in terms of the wave drag is studied with introduction of the area rule.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AGARD (1985) Compendium of unsteady aerodynamic measurements, Addendum No. 1, AGARD-R-702, May 1985
Barakos G, Drikakis D (2000) Numerical simulation of transonic buffet flows using various turbulence closures. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:620–626
Bauer F, Garabedian P, Korn D (1972) Supercritical wing sections, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, Berlin
Bauer F, Garabedian P, Korn D, Jameson A (1975) Supercritical wing sections II, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer, Berlin
Baurdoux HI, Boerstoel JW (1968) Symmetrical transonic potential flows around quasi-elliptical aerofoil sections. Report NLR-TR9007U, National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR, The Netherlands
Dowell EH (eds) (1995) A modern course in aeroelasticity. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Ecer A, Akay HU, Gülçat Ü (1977) On the solution of hyperbolic equations using finite element method. In: Symposium on applications of computer methods in engineering, Los Angeles, CA, August 23–26
Geissler W (2003) Numerical study of buffet and transonic flutter on the NLR7301 airfoil. Aerosp Sci Technol 7:540–550
Goorjian PM, Guruswamy GP (1985) Unsteady transonic aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations about airfoils and wings. AGARD-CP-374
Guruswamy GP, Obayashi S (1992) Transonic aeroelastic computations on wings using Navier–Stokes equations. AGARD-CP-507, March 1992
Hounjet MHL, Meijer JJ (1985) Application of time-linearized methods to oscillating wings in transonic flow and flutter. AGARD-CP-374
Isogai K (1992) Numerical simulation of shock-stall flutter of an airfoil using the Navier–Stokes equations. AGARD CP-507, March 1992
Jameson A (1999) Re-engineering the design process through computations. J Aircr 36(1):36–50
Jones RT (1946) Properties of low aspect ratio pointed wings at speeds below and above the speed of sound. NACA TN-1032
Kaynak Ü (1985) Computation of transonic separated wing flows using an Euler–Navier Stokes zonal approach. PhD Thesis, Stanford University
Küchemann D (1978) Aerodynamic design of aircraft. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Kuethe AM, Chow C-Y (1998) Foundations of aerodynamics, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Labrujere Th E, Loewe W, Sloof JW (1968) An approximate method for the determination of the pressure distribution on wings in the lower critical speed range. AGARD CP-35
Landahl MT (1962) Linearized theory for unsteady transonic flow. IUTAM Symposium, Aachen
Lock RC (1962) Some experiments on the design of swept wing body combinations at transonic speeds. IUTAM Symposium, Aachen
Lomax H, Heaslet MA (1956) Recent development in the theory of wing-body wave drag. J Aerosp Sci 23:1061–1074
Malone JB, Ruo SY, Sankar NL (1985) Computation of unsteady transonic flows about two-dimensional and three-dimensional AGARD standard configurations. AGARD-CP-374
McCroskey WJ (1982) Unsteady airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 14:285–311
McCroskey WJ, Kutler P, Bridgeman JO (1985) Status and prospects of computational fluid dynamics for unsteady transonic flows. AGARD-CP-374
Murman EM, Cole JD (1971) Calculation of plane steady transonic flows. AIAA J 9(1):114–121
Nieuwland GY, Spee BM (1968) Transonic shock-free flow, fact or fiction? AGARD CP No 35, Transonic aerodynamics, September 1968
Polhamus EC (1984) Applying slender wing benefits to military aircraft. J Aircr 21(8):545–559
Whitcomb RT, Clark LR (1965) An airfoil shape for efficient flight at supercritical mach numbers. NASA TMX-1109, July 1965
Whitcomb RT (1956) A study of the zero-lift drag-rise characteristics of wing-body combinations near the speed of sound. NACA Report 1273
Yang G, Obayashi S, Nakamichi J (2003) Aileron buzz simulation using an implicit multiblock aeroelastic solver. J Aircr 40(3):580–589
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Problems and Questions
Problems and Questions
-
6.1
Using the energy equation, obtain the linearized form of the relation between the perturbation potential and speed of sound, Eq. 6.1.
-
6.2
Based on the order of magnitude analysis, show that the time derivative of the perturbation potential is negligible compared to x derivative.
-
6.3
Obtain Eq. 6.11 from 6.10a,b by inverse Laplace transform using the convolution integral.
-
6.4
Show that at constant angle of attack the perturbation potential is given by Eq. 6.13.
-
6.5
Show that at constant angle of attack the surface pressure coefficient is given by Eq. 6.14.
-
6.6
Show that lower surface pressure is given by Eq. 6.15.
-
6.7
Show that the sectional lift coefficient depends on the angle of attack as expressed in Eq. 6.17.
-
6.8
Obtain the sectional moment coefficient and center of pressure using Eq. 6.16
-
6.9
Compare the surface pressure coefficient obtained with Dowell method using x 0 = b as expansion point and e 0 = 0.12 and f 0 = 2.4/b with the pressure coefficient obtained using Stahara–Spreiter method for the 6% thick Guderly airfoil. Discuss the choice of x 0 = b.
-
6.10
Solve Eq. 6.21 in Laplace domain, and obtain the expression 6.22 by inverse transform to give the boundary condition.
-
6.11
Obtain Eq. 6.23 from 6.24 by the limiting procedure as M ∞ → 1.
-
6.12
Show that for simple harmonically heaving plunging thin airfoil the surface pressure expression is given by Eq. 6.25 as the free stream Mach number approaches 1.
-
6.13
Using the values of Example 6.1, plot the phase lag of the surface pressure coefficient along the chord for a heaving plunging thin airfoil.
-
6.14
Find the amplitude of the (i) sectional lift coefficient and (ii) the sectional moment coefficient about the leading edge using the data given in Example 6.1.
-
6.15
Using Eq. 2.15 expressed for the velocity potential, obtain Eq. 6.26 for compressible steady flows.
-
6.16
What is a ‘shock doublet’ in unsteady transonic flow?
-
6.17
Discuss the ‘transonic dip’ phenomenon for the swept wing in a transonic unsteady flow.
-
6.18
What is the function of transonic dip in unsteady transonic flow?
-
6.19
Comment on the ‘area rule’ for the wing fuselage in transonic flow.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gülçat, Ü. (2011). Transonic flow. In: Fundamentals of Modern Unsteady Aerodynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14761-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14761-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14760-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14761-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)