Skip to main content

Hedging CDO Tranches in a Markovian Environment

  • Chapter

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM,volume 2003)

Abstract

In this first chapter, we show that a CDO tranche payoff can be perfectly replicated with a self-financed strategy based on the underlying credit default swaps. This extends to any payoff which depends only upon default arrivals, such as basket default swaps. Clearly, the replication result is model dependent and relies on two critical assumptions. First, we preclude the possibility of simultaneous defaults. The other assumption is that credit default swap premiums are adapted to the filtration of default times which therefore can be seen as the relevant information set on economic grounds. Our framework corresponds to a pure contagion model, where the arrivals of defaults lead to jumps in the credit spreads of survived names, the magnitude of which depending upon the names in question, and the whole history of defaults up to the current time. These jumps can be related to the derivatives of the joint survival function of default times. The dynamics of replicating prices of CDO tranches follows the same way. In other words, we only deal with default risks and not with spread risks. Unsurprisingly, the possibility of perfect hedging is associated with a martingale representation theorem under the filtration of default times. Subsequently, we exhibit a new probability measure under which the short term credit spreads (up to some scaling factor due to positive recovery rates) are the intensities associated with the corresponding default times. For ease of presentation, we introduced first some instantaneous default swaps as a convenient basis of hedging instruments. Eventually, we can exhibit a replicating strategy of a CDO tranche payoff with respect to actually traded credit default swaps, for instance, with the same maturity as the CDOtranche. Letus note that no Markovian assumption is required for the existence of such a replicating strategy. However, the practical implementation of actual hedging strategies requires some extra assumptions. We assume that all pre-default intensities are equal and only depend upon the current number of defaults. We also assume that all recovery rates are constant across names and time. In that framework, it can be shown that the aggregate loss process is a homogeneous Markov chain, more precisely a pure death process. Thanks to these restrictions, the model involves as many unknown parameters as the number of underlying names. Such Markovian model is also known as a local intensity model, the simplest form of aggregate loss models. As in local volatility models in the equity derivatives world, there is a perfect match of unknown parameters from a complete set of CDO tranches quotes. Numerical implementation can be achieved through a binomial tree, well-known to finance people, or by means of Markov chain techniques. We provide some examples and show that the market quotes of CDOs are associated with pronounced contagion effects. We can therefore explain the dynamics of the amount of hedging CDS and relate them to deltas computed by market practitioners. The figures are hopefully roughly the same, the discrepancies being mainly explained by contagion effects leading to an increase of dependence between default times after some defaults.

Keywords

  • Credit Default Swap
  • Credit Spread
  • Gaussian Copula
  • Credit Derivative
  • Default Time

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnsdorf, M.,Halperin, I.: BSLP: Markovian bivariate spread-loss model for portfolio credit derivatives. Working paper, JP Morgan (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arvanitis, A., Laurent, J.-P.: On the edge of completeness. RISK 10, 61–65 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Assaf, D., Langberg, N.A., Savits, T.H., Shaked M.: Multivariate phase-type distributions. Oper. Res. 32(3), 688–702 (1984)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Azizpour, S.,Giesecke, K.: Self-exciting corporate defaults: Contagion vs. frailty. Working paper, Stanford University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beumee, J.,Brigo, D.,Schiemert, D.,Stoyle, G.: Charting a course through the CDS Big Bang. Quantitative research, FitchSolutions (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bielecki, T.R., Rutkowski, M.: Credit Risk: Modeling, Valuation and Hedging. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bielecki, T.R., Jakubowski, J.,Vidozzi, A.,Vidozzi, L.: Study of dependence for some stochastic processes. Working paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bielecki, T.R., Jeanblanc, M.,Rutkowski, M.: Hedging of basket credit derivatives in default swap market. J. Credit Risk 3(1), 91–132 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blanchet-Scalliet, C.,Jeanblanc, M.: Hazard rate for credit risk and hedging defaultable contingent claims. Finance Stochast. 8, 145–159 (2004)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Brmaud, P.: Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brigo, D., Pallavicini, A.,Torresetti, R.: Calibration of CDO tranches with the dynamical generalized-Poisson loss model. Working paper, Banca IMI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cont, R.,Kan, Y.H.: Dynamic hedging of portfolio credit derivatives in top-down models. Financial Engineering Report 2008-08, Columbia University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cont, R.,Minca, A.: Recovering portfolio default intensities implied by CDO quotes. Financial Engineering Report 2008-01, Columbia University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cont, R.,Deguest, R.,Kan, Y.H.: Default intensities implied by CDO spreads: Inversion formula and model calibration. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics 1, 555–585 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Das, S.: Credit Derivatives: CDOs and Structured Credit Products. Wiley, NY (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Das, S.R., Duffie, D.,Kapadia, N.,Saita, L.: Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance 62(1), 93–117 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, M.,Lo, V.: Infectious defaults. Quant. Finance 1, 382–387 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. DeKoch, J.,Kraft, H.: CDOs in chains. Working paper, University of Kaiserslautern (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. DeServigny, A.,Jobst, N.: The Handbook of Structured Finance. McGraw-Hill, NY (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deguest, R.,Kan, Y.H.: A closed-form formula for the local intensity and its application to calibration. Working paper (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dellacherie, C.: Capacités et processus stochastiques. Springer, Berlin (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Derman, E.: Regimes of volatility. Quantitative Strategies Research Notes, Goldman Sachs (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Derman, E., Kani, I.: Riding on a smile. RISK 7(2), 32–39 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ding, X.,Giesecke, K.,Tomecek, P. Time-changed birth processes and multi-name credit. Oper. Res. 57(4), 990–1005 (2009)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Dupire, B.: Pricing with a smile. RISK 7(1), 18–20 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eckner, A.: Computational techniques for basic affine models of portfolio credit risk. J.Comput.Finance 13, 63–97 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Elliott, R.J., Jeanblanc, M.,Yor, M.: On models of default risk. Math. Finance 10, 179–196 (2000)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Epple, F.,Morgan, S.,Schloegl, L.: Joint distributions of portfolio losses and exotic portfolio products. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 10(4), 733–748 (2007)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Errais, E.,Giesecke, K.,Goldberg, L.R.: Pricing credit from the top down with affine point processes. Working paper, Stanford University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frey, R.,Backhaus, J.: Dynamic hedging of synthetic CDO tranches with spread and contagion risk. J. Econ. Dynam. Contr. 34, 710–724 (2010)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Frey, R.,Backhaus, J.: Pricing and hedging of portfolio credit derivatives with interacting default intensities. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 11(6), 611–634 (2008)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Galiani, S.,Kakodkar, A.,Shchetkovskiy, M.,Jónsson, J.G., Gallo, A.: Base correlation and beyond: Interpolation and extrapolation. Working paper, Credit Derivatives Strategy, Merrill Lynch (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gibson, M.S.: Credit derivatives and risk management. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Giesecke, K.,Goldberg, L.R.: A top down approach to multi-name credit. Working paper, Stanford University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Herbertsson, A.: Default contagion in large homogeneous portfolios. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Ali, P.U. (eds.) The Credit Derivatives Handbook. McGraw-Hill, NY (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Herbertsson, A.: Pricing synthetic CDO tranches in a model with default contagion using the matrix-analytic approach. J. Credit Risk 4(4), 3–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Herbertsson, A.,Rootzén, H.: Pricing k-th to default swaps under default contagion, the matrix-analytic approach. J. Comput. Finance 12(1), 49–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jarrow, R.A., Yu, F.: Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. J. Finance 56, 1765–1799 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Kakodkar, A.,Galiani, S.,Jónsson, J.G., Gallo, A.: Credit Derivatives Handbook 2006, vol. 2. Merrill Lynch, NY (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Karlin, S.,Taylor, H.M.: A First Course in Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. Academic Press, NY (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Krekel, M.,Partenheimer, J.: The implied loss surface of CDOs. Working paper, University of Ulm (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kusuoka, S.: A remark on default risk models. Adv. Math. Econ. 1, 69–82 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Lando, D.: Credit Risk Modeling and Applications. Princeton University Press, NJ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lando, D.,Nielsen, M.S.: Correlation in corporate defaults: Contagion or conditional independence. J. Financ. Intermed. 19(3), 355–372 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. Laurent, J.-P.: A note on the risk management of CDOs. Working paper, ISFA actuarial School, University of Lyon and BNP Paribas (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Laurent, J.-P., Leisen, D.: Building a consistent pricing model from observed option prices. In: Quantitative Analysis in Financial Markets: Collected Papers of the New York University Mathematical Finance Seminar, vol. II, pp. 216–238. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Laurent, J.-P., Cousin, A.,Fermanian, J.-D.: Hedging default risk of CDOs in Markovian contagion models. Quant. Finance (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lopatin, A.V., Misirpashaev, T.: Two-dimensional Markovian model for dynamics of aggregate credit loss. Working paper, NumeriX (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Meissner, G.: The Definitive Guide to CDOs. Riskbooks, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Meyer-Dautrich, S.,Wagner, C.K.J.: Minimum entropy calibration of CDO tranches. Working paper, Unicredit (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moler, C.,VanLoan, C.: Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later. SIAM Rev. 45(1), 3–49 (2003)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Morgan, S.,Mortensen, A.: CDO hedging anomalies in the base correlation approach, pp.49–61. Lehman Brothers, Quantitative Credit Research Quarterly, October (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Parcell, E.,Wood, J.: Wiping the smile off your base (correlation curve). Working paper, Derivative Fitch (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parker, E.,Brown, M.: The 2003 ISDA credit derivatives definitions. PLC Finance, NY (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Petrelli, A.,Zhang, J.,Jobst, N.,Kapoor, V.: A practical guide to CDO trading risk management. In: de Servigny, A., Jobst, N. (eds.) The Handbook of Structured Finance, pp.339–371. McGraw Hill, NY (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Protter, Ph.: Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Putyatin, P.,Prieul, D.,Maslova, S.: A Markovian approach to modelling correlated defaults. RISK 18(5), 76–81 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rubinstein, M.: Implied binomial trees. J. Finance 49(3), 771–818 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Schönbucher, P.: Credit Derivatives Pricing Models. Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schönbucher, P.J.: Portfolio losses and the term-structure of loss transition rates: A new methodology for the pricing of portfolio credit derivatives. Working paper, ETH Zürich (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schönbucher, P., Schubert, D.: Copula dependent default risk in intensity models. Working paper, Bonn University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Torresetti, R.,Brigo, D.,Pallavicini, A.: Implied expected tranched loss surface from CDO data. Working paper, Banca IMI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  63. vander Voort, M.: An implied loss model. Working paper, ABN Amro and Erasmus University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Walker, M.B.: Simultaneous calibration to a range of portfolio credit derivatives with a dynamic discrete-time multi-step Markov loss model. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 12(5), 633–662 (2009)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu, F.: Correlated defaults in intensity-based models. Math. Finance 17(2), 155–173 (2007)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Areski Cousin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cousin, A., Jeanblanc, M., Laurent, JP. (2011). Hedging CDO Tranches in a Markovian Environment. In: Paris-Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2010. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 2003. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14660-2_1

Download citation