Skip to main content

Different Methodologies for Patient Stratification Using Survival Data

  • Conference paper
  • 948 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 6160))

Abstract

Clinical characterization of breast cancer patients related to their risk and profiles is an important part for making their correct prognostic assessments. This paper first proposes a prognostic index obtained when it is applied a flexible non-linear time-to-event model and compares it to a widely used linear survival estimator. This index underpins different stratification methodologies including informed clustering utilising the principle of learning metrics, regression trees and recursive application of the log-rank test. Missing data issue was overcome using multiple imputation, which was applied to a neural network model of survival fitted to a data set for breast cancer (n=743). It was found the three methodologies broadly agree, having however important differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, T.G., Altman, D.G.: Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data an ovarian cancer case study. Journal of clinical epidemiology 56, 28–37 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H.C., Knook, D.L.: Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 18(6), 681–694 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandes, A.S., Jarman, I.H., Etchells, T.A., Fonseca, J.M., Biganzoli, E., Bajdik, C., Lisboa, P.J.G.: Missing data imputation in longitudinal cohort studies – application of PLANN-ARD in breast cancer survival. In: Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA’08, pp. 644–649 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lisboa, P.J.G., Wong, H., Harris, P., Swindell, R.: A Bayesian neural network approach for modelling censored data with an application to prognosis after surgery for breast cancer. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 28(1), 1–25 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrogi, F., Biganzoli, E., Boracchi, P.: Estimates of clinically useful measures in competing risks survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 27(30), 6407–6425 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Etchells, T.A., Fernandes, A.S., Jarman, I.H., Fonseca, J.M., Lisboa, P.J.G.: Stratification of severity of illness indices: a case study for breast cancer prognosis. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2008, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5178, pp. 214–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olsen, A.R., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. The Wadsworth & Brooks (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lisboa, P.J.G.: A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention. Neural Networks, Invited Paper 15(1), 9–37 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaski, S., Sinkkonen, J., Peltonen, J.: Bankruptcy analysis with self-organizing maps in learning metrics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 12(4), 936–947 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bacciu, D., Jarman, I.H., Etchells, T.A., Lisboa, P.J.G.: Patient Stratification with Competing Risks by Multivariate Fisher Distance. In: Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks (IJCNN’09), Atlanta, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bacciu, D., Starita, A.: Competitive repetition suppression (CoRe) clustering: A biologically inspired learning model with application to robust clustering. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 19(11), 1922–1941 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amari, S.-I.: Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Comput. 10(2), 251–276 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fernandes, A.S., Bacciu, D., Jarman, I.H., Etchells, T.A., Fonseca, J.M., Lisboa, P.J.G. (2010). Different Methodologies for Patient Stratification Using Survival Data. In: Masulli, F., Peterson, L.E., Tagliaferri, R. (eds) Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics. CIBB 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14571-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14571-1_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14570-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14571-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics