Advertisement

Towards a Structural Model for Intention to Play a Digital Educational Game

  • Xu Sun
  • Effie Lai-Chong Law
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6250)

Abstract

Computer games are very popular among children. There is increasing interest to apply computer game in education to render learning more attractive and motivating. However, it remains to be explored what factors drive children to play educational games. In this paper, we investigate impacts of game narrative and player’s characteristics (e.g. gender, personality) on children’s intention to play a digital education game. The results revealed that effect of game narrative, gender, and sensation seeking personality are significant factors in predicting children’s gameplay intention. Implications of this study are discussed from perspectives of academic research as well as educational game design.

Keywords

Computer Game Game Design Educational Game Digital Game Kaiser Family Foundation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. Children and video games. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park (2002) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dong, M.K.: The moderating role of locus of control on the links between experiential motives and intention to play online games. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 466–474 (2009) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P.: Why do people play on-line games? an extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management 41(7), 853–868 (2004) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Pecj, J., Carson, S.: Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing 77, 511–535 (2001) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, D., Kim, J.: Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 7(1), 11–24 (2004) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: TAM 3: Advancing the Technology Acceptance Model with a Focus on Interventions (Manuscript in-preparation) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dickey, M.D.: Ninja Looting for instructional design: The design challenges of creating a gamebased learning environment. In: ACM SIGGRAPH, Boston (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisch, S.M.: Making educational computer games ”educational”. In: Interaction design and children, Boulder (2005) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruner, J.: The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1), 1–21 (1991) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Champagnat, R., Delmas, G., Augeraud, M.: A Storytelling Model for Educational Games. In: The first International Workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games, Maastricht, The Netherlands (2008) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christou, I., Perdikaris, N., Tragazikis, P., Douros, A., Galani, E., Gouscos, D., Meimaris, M.: ”The Magic Potion” - An Adventure Game for Learning. In: The 2nd International Workshop on Story- Telling and Educational Games. Aachen, Germany (2009) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickey, M.D.: Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(3), 439–451 (2005) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halverson, R., Shaffer, D., Squire, K., Steinkuehler, C.: Theorizing games in/and education. In: The 7th international conference on Learning Sciences, Bloomington (2006) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schrier, K.: Using augmented reality games to teach 21st century skills. In: The SIGGRAPH, Boston (2006) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave MacMillan, New York (2003) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burrow, A., More, G.: Architectural designers and the interactive audience. In: The second conference on Interactive entertainment, Sydney, Australia (2005) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., Adams, C.: The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology 30(4), 311–321 (1999) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jennings, M.: Best practices in corporate training and the role of aesthetics: Interviews with eight experts. In: The 2001 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, SanDiego, CA (2001) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waraich, A.: Using narrative as a motivating device to teach binary arithmetic and logic gates. In: The 9th annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Leeds, United Kingdom (2004) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malone, T.: Towards a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 4, 333–369 (1981) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Game Based Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quinn, C.: Designing an instructional game: reflections on Quest for Independence. Education and Information Technologies 1, 251–269 (1996) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fang, X.W., Susy, S., Chan, C.N.: An Online Survey System on Computer Game Enjoyment and Personality. HCI (4), 304–314 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J., Sun, J. (eds.): Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ivory, J.D.: Still a man’s game: Gender representation in online reviews of video games. Mass Communication & Society 9(1), 103–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C.: Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(4) (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maddi, S.R.: Personality theories: a comparative analysis, 5th edn. Dorsey Press, Chicago (1989)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., Eysenck, H.J.: Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural age and sex comparisons. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46, 139–149 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lankveld van, G., Spronck, P., Rauterberg, M.: Difficulty scaling through incongruity. In: Mateas, M., Darken, C. (eds.) The Fourth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Enter-tainment Conference, pp. 228–229 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    López-Bonilla, J.M., López-Bonilla, L.M.: Sensation seeking and e-shoppers. Electronic Commerce Research 8, 143–154 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ravaja, N., Salminen, M., Holopainen, J., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Järvinen, A.: Emotional Response Patterns and Sense of Presence during Video Games: Potential Criterion Variables for Game Design. In: The third Nordic conference on Humancomputer interaction, New York, pp. 339–347 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fang, X.W., Zhao, F.: Sensation Seeking, Self Forgetfulness, and Computer Game Enjoyment. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) Interface, HCII 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5618, pp. 632–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Slater, M.D.: Alienation, aggression and sensation seeking as predictor of adoles-cent use of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication 53, 105–201 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agosto, D.: Girls and gaming: A summary of the research with implications for practice. Teacher Librarian 31, 8–14 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stephenson, M.T., Hoyle, R.H., Palmgreen, P., Slater, M.D.: Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 279–286 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Farrell, D., Kostkova, P., Lecky, D., McNulty, D.: Teaching Children Hygiene Using Prob lem Based Learning: The Story Telling Approach to Games Based. In: The 2nd International Workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games, Aachen, Germany (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xu Sun
    • 1
  • Effie Lai-Chong Law
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniveristy of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations