A Social Network System for Analyzing Publication Activities of Researchers

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 76)


Social networks play an increasingly important role in knowledge management, information retrieval, and collaboration. In order to leverage the full potential of social networks, social networks need to be supported through technical systems. Within this paper, we introduce such a technical system. It is called AcaSoNet. It is a system for identifying and managing social networks of researchers. In particular, AcaSoNet employs a combination of techniques to extract co-author relationships between researchers and to detect groups of persons with similar interest. Past systems have used either search engines to extract information about social networks from the Web (Web mining) or have required people’s effort to enter their relationships to others into the system (as being done by most social network services). AcaSoNet, instead, uses a combination of these two types, thereby achieving data reliability and scalability. It extracts and collects data of researchers from the Web but allows researchers to modify the data. In the current version, our system can identify the social network based on publication lists and evaluate the publication activities of users within an academic community.


Social network systems academic community co-author relationship publication analysis productivity analysis knowledge sharing knowledge transfer Web mining performance analysis social network analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., Hwang, J.: Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: Two indices, the RC-Index and the CC-Index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. In: Scientometrics. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altmann, J., Abbasi, A., Hwang, J.: Evaluating the productivity of researchers and their Communities: The RP-Index and the CP-Index. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications 6(2) (2009) ISSN:0972-9038Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adamic, L.A., Adar, E.: Friends and neighbors on the Web. Social Networks 25(3), 211–230 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aleman-Meza, B., Nagarajan, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Ding, L., Kolari, P., Sheth, A.P., Arpinar, I.B., Joshi, A., Finin, T.: Semantic analytics on social networks: experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. In: WWW Conference. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derek, J., deSolla Price: deSolla Price: Networks of scientific papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front. Science 149(3683), 510–515 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goecks, J., Mynatt, E.D.: Leveraging social networks for information sharing. In: CSCW Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: Inferring binary trust relationships in Web-based social networks. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 6(4), 497–529 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golbeck, J., Parsia, B.: Trust network-based filtering of aggregated claims. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics, and Ontologies (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heimeriks, G., Hoerlesberger, M., van den Besselaar, P.: Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics 58(2), 391–413 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin, Y., Matsuo, Y., Ishizuka, M.: Extracting a social network among entities by web mining. In: ISWC 2006 Workshop on Web Content Mining with Human Resources (2006) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kautz, H., Selman, B., Shah, M.: Referral Web: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 63–65 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kousha, K., Thelwall, M.: Google scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(7), 1055–1065 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuo, Y., Mori, J., Hamasaki, M., Nishimura, T., Takeda, H., Hasida, K., Ishizuka, M.: POLYPHONET: An advanced social network extraction system from the Web. Journal of Web Semantics 5(4), 262–278 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mika, P.: Flink: Semantic web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Journal of Web Semantics, vol.3(2) (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miki, T., Nomura, S., Ishida, T.: Semantic Web Link Analysis to Discover Social Relationships in Academic Communities. In: SAINT, pp. 38–45. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mori, J., Sugiyama, T., Matsuo, Y.: Real-world oriented information sharing using social networks. In: ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nann, S., Krauss, J., Fuehres, H., Gloor, P., Fischbach, K.: Identifying Influentials by Example - the MVP (Most Valuable Player) Algorithm. Sunbelt 2010, Lago Di Garda (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tyler, J., Wilkinson, D., Huberman, B.: Email as spectroscopy: Automated discovery of community structure within organizations, pp. 81–96. Kluwer, B.V (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program, Department of Industrial Engineering, College of EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth-Korea

Personalised recommendations