Analysis of Aerodynamic Indices for Racing Sailing Yachts: a Computational Study and Benchmark on up to 128 CPUs.

  • Ignazio Maria Viola
  • Raffaele Ponzini
  • Daniele Rocchi
  • Fabio Fossati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 74)


This work presents a feasibility study for trustable and affordable CFD analysis of aerodynamic indices of racing sailing yachts. A detailed reconstructed model of a recent America’s Cup class mainsail and asymmetrical spinnaker under light wind conditions has been studied using massive parallel RANS modeling on 128 CPUs. A detailed comparison between computational and experimental data has been performed and discussed, thanks to wind tunnel tests performed with the same geometry under the same wind conditions. The computational grid used was of about 37 millions of tetrahedra and the parallel job has been performed on up to 128 CPUs of a distributed memory Linux cluster using a commercial CFD code. An in deep analysis of the CPU usage has been performed during the computation by means of Ganglia and a complete benchmark of the studied case has been done for 64, 48, 32, 16, 8 and 4 CPUs analyzing the advantages offered by two kind of available interconnection technologies: Ethernet and Infiniband. Besides to this computational benchmark, a sensitivity analysis of the global aerodynamic force components, the lift and the drag, to different grid resolution size has been performed. In particular, mesh size across three orders of magnitude have been investigated: from 0.06 million up to 37 million cells. The computational results obtained here are in great agreement with the experimental data. In particular, the fully tetrahedral meshes allow appreciating the beneficial effect of the increasing of the grid resolution without changing grid topology: a converging trend to the experimental value is observed. In conclusion, the present results confirm the validity of RANS modeling as a design tool and show the advantages and costs of a large tetrahedral mesh for downwind sail design purposes.

Key words

CFD Parallel Computing Benchmarks Yacht Sail Plans Downwind Sails Wind Tunnel Tests 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.H. Milgram: The Aeodynamic of Sails; proceedings of 7th Symposium of Naval Hydrodynamic, pp. 1397-1434, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arvel Gentry: The Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Sails; Proceedings of the Symposium on Hydrodynamic Peformance Enhancement for Marine Applications, Newport, Rhode Island, US, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Miyata, Y.W. Lee. Application of CFD Simulation to the Design of Sails. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 4:163-172, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.B.G. Querard and P.A. Wilson. Aerodynamic of Modern Square Head Sails: a Comparative Study Between Wind-Tunnel Experiments and RANS Simulations. In the Modern Yacht, Southampton, UK, 11-12 Oct 2007. London, UK, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 8 pp. 107-114, 2007.
  5. 5.
    P.J. Richards, A. Johnson, A. Stanton: America’s Cup downwind sails - vertical wings or horizontal parachutes?; Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89:1565–1577, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    William C. Lasher, James R. Sonnenmeier, David R. Forsman, Jason Tomcho: The aerodynamics of symmetric spinnakers; Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 93:311-337, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.L. Hedges: Computer Modelling of Downwind Sails; MF Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.L. Hedges, P.J. Richards, G.D. Mallison: Computer Modelling of Downwind Sails; Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 63 95-110, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    William C. Lasher and Peter J. Richards: Validation of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations for International America’s Cup Class Spinnaker Force Coefficients in an Atmospheric Boundary Layer; Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 22–38, March 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    William Lascher & James R. Sonnenmeier: An Analysis of Practical RANS Simulations for Spinnaker Aerodynamics; Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96 143–165, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Challenger of Record and Defender for America’s Cup XXXII: America’s Cup Class Rule, Version 5.0; 15th December 2003;Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Fossati, S. Muggiasca, I.M. Viola, A. Zasso: Wind Tunnel Techniques for Investigation and Optimization of Sailing Yachts Aerodynamics; proceedings of 2nd High Performance Yacht Design Conference; Auckland, NZ, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ignazio Maria Viola
    • 1
  • Raffaele Ponzini
    • 2
  • Daniele Rocchi
    • 3
  • Fabio Fossati
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Unitthe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.High-Performance Computing GroupCILEA ConsortiumMilanItaly
  3. 3.Mechanical DepartmentPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations