Advertisement

Determinants of Continuance Intention towards Self-service Innovation: A Case of Electronic Government Services

  • Shu-Lu Hsu
  • Huichich Wang
  • Hersen Doong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 53)

Abstract

Service science has attracted the attention of researchers from different disciplines and has become an increasing important issue. As service science was proposed to integrate people, management and technologies, the self-service innovation, such as electronic government (e-Government) services, have shown its unique implication in this field. To explore the determinants of continuance intention towards self-service innovation, this study utilizes psychological approaches, revealing how users’ innovative style and involvement level may influence their continuance intentions towards innovative e-Government service. Based on psychological and marketing theories, this study proposed research propositions and provide useful insights for practical implications in terms of enhancing the execution performance via integrating the psychological approach into the pilot implementation strategy for self-service innovation.

Keywords

Service Sciences Self-Service Continuance intention 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Society for Public Administration. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. UN/ASPA, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Australian Government: Australians’ Use of and Satisfaction with E-government Services. Commonwealth of Australia, Barton (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beatty, S.E., Smith, S.M.: External Search Effort: An Investigation Across Several Product Categories. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 83–95 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bekkers, V.: E-government and the Emergence of Virtual Organizations in the Public Sector. Information Polity 8, 89–101 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berner Fachhochschule, Unisys: E-Government Trendbarometer. Thalwil, Unisys (Schweiz) AG (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhattacherjee, A., Sanford, C.: Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly 30, 805–825 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bongers, F., Holland, C., Vermaas, K., Vandeberg, R.: Burgers Aan Bod. In: Elektronische Overheidsdienstverlening in Het Perspectief Van De Vraagzijde. Utrecht, Dialogic (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown, M.M., Brudney, J.L.: Achieving Advanced Electronic Government Services: An Examination of Obstacles and Implications from An International Perspective. In: National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, R.A., Goldsmith, R.E.: Interpersonal Influence and Consumer Innovativeness. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30, 34–43 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Devadoss, P.R., Pan, S.L., Huang, J.C.: Structurational Analysis of E-government Initiatives: A Case Study of SCO. Decision Support Systems 34, 253–269 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erin Research: The Institute for Citizen-Centred Service Citizens. First 3 Research, Canada (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foxall, G.R.: Science and Interpretation in Consumer Research: A Radical Behaviourist Perspective. European Journal of Marketing 5, 6–99 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foxall, G.R.: Consumer decision making process, level and style. In: Baker, M.J. (ed.) The Marketing Book, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foxall, G.R., Bhate, S.: Cognitive Style, Personal Involvement and Situation as Determinants of Computer Use. Technovation 11, 183–199 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Foxall, G.R., Bhate, S.: Cognitive Style and Use-innovativeness for Applications Software in Home Computing: Implications for New Product Strategy. Technovation 13, 311–325 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Goldsmith, R.E.: Explaining and Predicting Consumer Intention to Purchase Over the Internet: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 10, 22–28 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldsmith, R.E., Flynn, L.R.: Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product Markets. European Journal of Marketing 26, 42–55 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glushko, R.J.: Designing a Service Science Discipline with Discipline. IBM Systems Journal 47, 15–27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., Neumann, M.M.: The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing 70, 19–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirton, M.: Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 61, 622–629 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Latour, M.S., Hanna, J.B., Miller, M.D., Pitts, R.E.: Consumer Involvement with Personal Computer Technology: A Multi-sample Analysis. American Business Review 20, 1–12 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., Wessels, G.: Toward a Conceptual Foundation for Service Science: Contributions from Service-Dominant Logic. IBM Systems Journal 47, 5–14 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Means, G., Schneider, D.: The E-Business Revolution and the Design of 21st Century Companies and Markets. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Midgley, D.F., Dowling, G.R.: Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 4, 229–242 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mittal, B., Lee, M.S.: A Causal Model of Consumer Involvement. Journal of Economic Psychology 10, 363–389 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paulson, L.D.: Services Science: A New Field for Today’s Economy. IEEE Computer 39, 18–21 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context. Advances in Consumer Research 8, 20–24 (1981)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pieterson, W., van Dijk, J.: Channel Choice Determinants: An Exploration of the Factors that Determine the Choice of a Service Channel in Citizen Initiated Contacts. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 228, pp. 173–182 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pitkänen, O., Virtanen, P., Kemppinen, J.: Legal Research Topics in User-Centric Services. IBM Systems Journal 47, 143–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reddick, C.G.: Citizen Interaction with E-government: from the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22, 38–57 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robertson, T.S., Myers, J.H.: Personality Correlates of Opinion Leadership and Innovative Buying Behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 6, 164–168 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems. IEEE Computer 40, 71–77 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, H.C., Pallister, J.G., Foxall, G.R.: Innovativeness and Involvement as Determinants of Website Loyalty: I. A Test of the Style/Involvement Model in the Context of Internet Buying. Technovation 26, 1357–1365 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Warrington, P., Shim, S.: An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Product Involvement and Brand Commitment. Psychology and Marketing 17, 761–782 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zaichkowsky, J.L.: The Personal Involvement: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising. Journal of Advertising 23, 59–70 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shu-Lu Hsu
    • 1
  • Huichich Wang
    • 2
  • Hersen Doong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management Information SystemsNational Chiayi UniversityChiayiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Information ManagementNational Chung Cheng UniversityChiayiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations