Framework for Design Research in Health and Care Services

  • Eva-Maria Hempe
  • Terry Dickerson
  • Anthony Holland
  • P. John Clarkson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 53)


In England, services addressing the complex needs of people with learning disabilities by integrating health and social care are currently designed in an ad hoc fashion. A structured approach has the potential to address variable levels of service provision and quality as well as provide clarity about the purpose and boundaries of the services. A design process is a series of steps taken to develop a product or process from initial needs to final design specifications and implementation. Currently no structured design process for these complex health and care services exists. Based on a literature review and an extensive set of interviews and observations carried out in a learning disability service we suggest a research framework rooted in engineering design to develop an appropriate design process.

An existing model for design research forms the basis of an exploratory approach that allows for adaptation to different internal and external factors and constraints.


Framework health care social care integrated services learning disability intellectual disability design research design model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Definition: Intellectual disability, (accessed 2009)
  2. 2.
    Berwick, D.M.: Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Ann. Intern. Med. 128(8), 651–656 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aspray, T.J., Francis, R.M., Tyrer, S.P., Quilliam, S.J.: Patients with learning disability in the community. BMJ 318(7182), 476–477 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper, S.A., Smiley, E., Morrison, J., Williamson, A., Allan, L.: Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associated factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry 190(1), 27–35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goh, S., Holland, A.J.: A framework for commissioning services for people with learning disabilities. J. Public Health 16(3), 279–285 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lovlie, L., Reason, B., Mugglestone, M., Rottingen, J.A.: A healthy relationship. Touchpoint 2, 11–19 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tackara, J.: Would it be Great if.. Dott 07, Design Council, London (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parker, S., Heapy, J.: The Journey to the Interface - How public service design can connect users to reform. Demos (July 2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement: Experience Based Design, (accessed 2009)
  10. 10.
    Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A.L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., Tyrer, P.: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 321(7262), 694–696 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    NHS Integrated Service Improvement Programme: Roadmap for transformational change (2006),
  12. 12.
    Blessing, L.T., Chakrabarti, A., Wallace, K.M.: An overview of descriptive studies in relation to a general design research methodology. In: Frankerberger, E., Badke-Schaub, P., Birkhofer, H. (eds.) Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development, pp. 42–56. Springer, London (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cambridgeshire Learning Disability Partnership: Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Adults with Learning Disabilities 2007/2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cambridgeshire County Council: Strategy for the Delivery of Services to People with Disabilities (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering design: A systematic approach. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morelli, N.: Social innovation and new industrial contexts: Can designers ”Industrialize” socially responsible solutions. Design Issues 23(4), 3 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cottham, H., Leadbeater, C.: Health: Co-Creating Services. Design Council, London (November 2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniels, V., Sandler, I.: Use of quality management methods in the transition from efficacious prevention programs to effective prevention services. American Journal of Community Psychology 41(3), 250–261 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coiera, E.: Designing interactions. Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology in Health Care Work, 97 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duncan, A.K., Breslin, M.A.: Innovating health care delivery: the design of health services. Journal of Business Strategy 30(2/3), 13–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bucciarelli, L.L.: An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies 9(3), 159–168 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Department of Health: Our Health Our Care Our Say: a new direction for community services (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hunt, G.: Commissioning Strategy for Learning Disabilities 2008-2011. Cambridgeshire County Council - Disabilities Services (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mencap: Death by indifference (2007),
  25. 25.
    Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O.: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82(4), 581–629 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva-Maria Hempe
    • 1
  • Terry Dickerson
    • 1
  • Anthony Holland
    • 2
  • P. John Clarkson
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering Design Centre, Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Section of Developmental Psychiatry, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations