Skip to main content

Restricted Quantification over Tastes

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6042))

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of statements with predicates of personal taste (tasty, fun, etc.) Rather than directly relativizing semantic interpretation to a judge (cf., Lasersohn, 2005), this paper aims to capture the phenomenon called ‘faultless disagreement’ (the fact that one can deny a speaker’s subjective utterance without challenging the speaker‘s opinion) by means of pragmatic restrictions on quantification domains. Using vagueness models, a statement like the cake is tasty is analyzed as true in a partial context c iff it is true in the set of completions t consistent with c (Kamp, 1975), wherein tasty denotes different, contextually possible, taste measures (Kennedy, 1999). Phrases like for me restrict the set of completions to those with taste measures consistent with the speaker’s taste. Faultless disagreement naturally follows assuming speakers accommodate or reject implicit restrictions of this sort (Lewis, 1979).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. von Fintel, K.: Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Ph.D. Dissertation, Uni. of Massachusetts, Amherst (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Fintel, K., Gillies, A.S.: Might Made Right. In: Egan, A., Weatherson, B. (eds.) Epistemic modality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. von Fintel, K., Gillies, A.S.: CIA Leaks. The Philosophical Review 117(1), 77–98 (2008a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kadmon, N., Landman, F.: Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353–422 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamp, H.: Two theories about adjectives. In: Keenan, E.L. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 123–155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy, C.: Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, NY (1997 UCSC PhD thesis) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kratzer, A.: Conditional necessity and possibility. In: Bauerle, R., Egli, U., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Semantics from different points of view. Springer, Heidelberg (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kratzer, A.: Conditionals. In: Farley, A.M., Farley, P.T., McCullough, K.E. (eds.) CLS 22 part 2: Papers from the parasession on pragmatics and grammatical theory. CLS, University of Chicago, Chicago (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lasersohn, P.: Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 643–686 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, D.: Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–359 (1983); Lewis, D.K.: Philosophical Papers 1, pp. 233–249. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacFarlane, J.: Making sense of relative truth. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian society, pp. 321–339 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nouwen, R.: Predicates of (Im)personal Taste. Manuscript (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Partee, B.: Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In: Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting, Part 1. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sassoon, W.: Galit: Semantics with clusters of properties. In: Kissine, M., De Brabanter, P. (eds.) Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive models, CRISPI, Emerald group publishing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stanley, Szabo: Mind and Language vol. 15(2), pp. 219–261 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf, L.: Objective Judgment. Manuscript. ILLC/University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sassoon, G.W. (2010). Restricted Quantification over Tastes. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics