Skip to main content

Reexamination of CBR Hypothesis

  • Conference paper
Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development (ICCBR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6176))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most of the recent literature on complexity measures in textual case-based reasoning examined alignment between problem space and solution space, which used to be an issue of formulating CBR hypothesis. However, none of existing complexity measures could dispel the specter of predefined class label that does not appear in public textual datasets available, or clarify the correctness of the proposed solutions in the retrieved cases most similar to a target problem. This paper presented a novel alignment measure to circumvent these difficulties by calculating rank correlation between most similar case rankings in problem space and most similar case rankings in solution space. We also examined how to utilize existing alignment measures for textual case retrieval and textual case base maintenance. Empirical evaluation on Aviation Investigation Reports from Transportation Safety Board of Canada showed that rank correlation alignment measure might become a promising method for case-based non-classification systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Leake, D.B.: CBR in context: The present and future. In: Leake, D.B. (ed.) Case based reasoning: Experiences, lessons, and future directions, pp. 3–30. MIT, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leake, D.B., Wilson, D.C.: When Experience Is Wrong: Examining CBR for Changing Tasks and Environments. In: Althoff, K.-D., Bergmann, R., Branting, L.K. (eds.) ICCBR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1650, pp. 218–232. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamontagne, L.: Textual CBR Authoring using Case Cohesion. In: TCBR 2006 - Reasoning with Text, Proceedings of the ECCBR 2006 Workshops, pp. 33–43 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Massie, S., Wiratunga, N., Craw, S., Donati, A., Vicari, E.: From Anomaly Reports to Cases. In: Weber, R.O., Richter, M.M. (eds.) ICCBR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4626, pp. 359–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraborti, S., Beresi, U., Wiratunga, N., Massie, S., Lothian, R., Watt, S.: A Simple Approach towards Visualizing and Evaluating Complexity of Textual Case Bases. In: TCBR 2007 – Beyond Retrieval, Proc. of the ICCBR 2007 Workshops (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hullermeier, E.: Credible case-based inference using similarity profiles. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(6), 847–858 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Massie, S., Craw, S., Wiratunga, N.: When Similar Problems Don’t Have Similar Solutions. In: Weber, R.O., Richter, M.M. (eds.) ICCBR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4626, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Raghunandan, M.A., Wiratunga, N., Chakraborti, S., Massie, S., Khemani, D.: Evaluation Measures for TCBR Systems. In: Althoff, K.-D., Bergmann, R., Minor, M., Hanft, A. (eds.) ECCBR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5239, pp. 444–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Raghunandan, M.A., Chakraborti, S., Khemani, D.: Robust Measures of Complexity in TCBR. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5650, pp. 270–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolodner, J.L.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faltings, B.: Probabilistic Indexing for Case-Based Prediction. In: Leake, D.B., Plaza, E. (eds.) ICCBR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1266, pp. 611–622. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., Mahdian, M., Sivakumar, D., Vee, E.: Comparing Partial Rankings. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 17(3), 628–648 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. JCOLIBRI CBR Framework, Group for Artificial Intelligence Applications, Complutense University of Madrid, http://gaia.fdi.ucm.es/projects/jcolibri/jcolibri2/index.html

  14. Recio-Gacia, J.A., Diaz-Agudo, B., Gonzalez-Calero, P.A.: Textual CBR in jCOLIBRI: From Retrieval to Reuse. In: TCBR 2007 – Beyond Retrieval, Proc. of the ICCBR 2007 TCBR Workshops (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delany, S.J., Bridge, D.G.: Catching the Drift: Using Feature-Free Case-Based Reasoning for Spam Filtering. In: Weber, R.O., Richter, M.M. (eds.) ICCBR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4626, pp. 314–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, Xf., Shi, Zl., Zhao, Hc. (2010). Reexamination of CBR Hypothesis. In: Bichindaritz, I., Montani, S. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development. ICCBR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14273-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14274-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics