Estimation of Safety Requirements for Wayside Hot Box Detection Systems
The estimation of safety requirements for wayside train monitoring systems is becoming more and more relevant due to the fact that new technologies are currently developed to recognize various fault states in railway operation during vehicles run. If such systems try to enter the market soon, the question arises in the process of accreditation at the national notified body. To support this process the BP risk methodology was used in this paper to estimate the required safety integrity level for such monitoring devices.
KeywordsRisk Analysis Hot Box Detection Systems BP-Risk
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bepperling, S.-L.: Validation of a semi-quantitative approach for railway risk assessments. PhD thesis, Institute of railway systems engineering and traffic safety, Technical University of Braunschweig (2008). (This thesis is only available in German: http://www.digibib.tu-bs.de/?docid=00024255).
- 2.Braband, J.: Risikoanalysen in der Eisenbahn-Automatisierung. In: Eurailpress Edition Signal + Draht, Hestra-Verlag, Hamburg (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.CENELEC: Railway application - Communications, signalling and processing systems - safety related electronic systems for signalling, EN 50129. (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Deutsche Bahn AG: DB Richtlinie 413, Bahnbetrieb- Infrastruktur gestalten. valid since 01.01.2002, Version of 2006Google Scholar
- 5.Eisenbrand, E.: PHOENIX MB: Die neue Dimension in der Heißläuferortung. In: Signal + Draht 93 (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.European Parliament: Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 of 24 April 2009 on the adoption of a common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment as referred to in Article 6(3)(a) of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. EN L 108/4 Official Journal of the European Union, 29.4.2009Google Scholar
- 7.Hinzen, A.: The influence of the human error on the safety of railways. Dissertation, Institute of Transport Science and Chair of Railway Engineering and Transport Economics, Institute of Technology of North Rhine- Westphalia RWTH Aachen (1993)Google Scholar
- 8.IEC: Safety of machinery - Functional safety of safety-related electrical electronic and programmable electronic control systems. IEC 62061 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Milius, B.: A new classification for risk assessment methods. In: Proceedings FORMS/FORMAT 2007. Braunschweig, Hrsg. Schnieder, E. und Tarnai, G.: Formal methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems, pp. 258 - 267Google Scholar
- 10.Mironov, A., Tagirov, A.: Use of complexes KTSM in modern conditions. Automation, Communications, Information Science 9 (2002) p. 59Google Scholar
- 11.Mironov, A.: “New potentialities of KTSM and ASK PS”, Automation, Communications, Information Science 12 (2005) p. 64-67.Google Scholar
- 12.Pachl, J.: “railroad construction”, lecture notes, Institute of railway systems engineering and traffic safety, Technical University of Braunschweig, 2003.Google Scholar
- 13.Rottensteiner, U.: “VAE-HOA 400 DS - Heißläuferortungsanlagen für finnische Hochgeschwindigkeitsstrecken”, Signal + Draht 95 (2003) p. 6-10.Google Scholar
- 14.Schöbel, A., Pisek, M., Karner, J.: “Hot box detection systems as a part of automated train observation in Austria”, EURNEX - ZEL 2006, Zilina; 30.05.2006 - 31.05.2006; in: “Towards the competitive rail systems in europe”, (2006), 8080705518; p. 157 - 161.Google Scholar
- 15.Šhvalov, D., Šapovalov, V. “Systems for diagnosis of rolling-stock: textbook for technical schools and colleges of railway transport”, edited by D. Švalov. Moscow; “Maršrut”, (2005); 268 p.Google Scholar