Abstract
Since its inception, the European Central Bank (ECB) has regarded communication as an integral part of its monetary policy. It has communicated frequently to the public on various issues, such as its objective, its policy decisions, and the economic outlook. In doing so, the ECB has used various communication channels. For instance, the ECB extensively uses press conferences to inform the public on its decisions almost on a real-time basis. In addition, the ECB employs other communication channels, like the Monthly Bulletin, its website, as well as speeches by and interviews with prominent ECB policymakers.
The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and should not be attributed to De Nederlandsche Bank.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
Another difference may be the asymmetry in the treatment of macroeconomic information. Market participants have a monitoring horizon biased toward short-term movements of financial markets, while the central bank analyses every kind of economic development and their short to medium-term impact on inflation and economic activity. As a consequence, market participants have a limited ability to build proper data-driven economic scenarios consistent with the central bank’s view of future inflation. Communication may help them forming a better view.
- 3.
Romer and Romer (2000) provide statistical evidence that the Federal Reserve staff forecasts for output and inflation have been more accurate than private sector forecasts over the past several decades. Gamber and Smith (2009) find that the Fed’s forecast errors remain significantly smaller than the private sector’s but the gap has narrowed considerable since the mid-1980s, especially after 1994.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
As Bernanke and Boivin (2003) point out, most empirical analyses of monetary policy have been confined to frameworks in which the central bank is implicitly assumed to exploit only a limited amount of information, like in the Taylor-rule model. In practice, the central banks’ approach to data analysis typically mixes the use of large macro-econometric models, smaller statistical models, heuristic and judgmental analyses, and informal weighting of information from diverse sources. One way of interpreting central bank communication may be that it summarizes the central bank’s assessment of all the information it employs. In that case, models using central bank communication should outperform those that rely only on a limited number of macro variables.
- 8.
The sample period is 6 May 1999 to 2 May 2002. This period is interesting as both the ECB and financial markets had to learn how to deal with communication by a newly created international organisation. Further details are given in Jansen and De Haan (2006).
- 9.
These expectations are taken from the Reuters poll of forecasters. Before each ECB interest rate decision, Reuters polls key economists on their views on the main refinancing rate after the upcoming meeting. The use of these data instead of market-based expectations allows us to examine the impact of communication dispersion on market uncertainty as reflected in the dispersion of the views of the forecasters.
- 10.
We also estimated specifications with a linear trend as, over the years, the ECB may have become more predictable. This did not affect the results.
- 11.
In this line of research, communication is quantified in order to assess both the direction and magnitude of its effects on asset prices. Communications must be classified according to their content and/or likely intention, and then coded on a numerical scale. Negative (positive) values are assigned to communications that are perceived as dovish (hawkish), and zero to those that appear to be neutral. Whereas some researchers restrict the coding to directional indications by using a scale between −1 and +1 (e.g., Jansen & De Haan 2005; Ehrmann & Fratzscher 2007a), others assign a finer grid that is at least suggestive of magnitude (Berger, De Haan, & Sturm, 2010; Rosa & Verga 2007, 2008, 2008; Heinemann & Ullrich 2007; Musard-Gies 2006), e.g. by coding statements on a scale from −2 to +2.
References
Amato, J. D., Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2002). Communication and monetary policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(4), 495–503.
Andersson, M. (2007). Using intraday data to gauge financial market responses to Fed and ECB monetary policy decisions. ECB Working Paper No. 726.
Andersson, M., Overby, L.J. & Sebestyén, S. (2009). Which news moves the Euro area bond market? German Economic Review, 10(1), 1–31.
Berger, H., Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2006). Monetary policy in the media. ECB Working Paper No. 679.
Berger, H., De Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (2010). Does money matter in the ECB strategy? New evidence based on ECB communication, International Journal of Finance and Economics, forthcoming.
Bernanke, B. (2004). Fedspeak, remarks at the meetings of the American Economic Association, San Diego. The Federal Reserve Board. http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/200401032/default.htm.
Bernanke, B., & Boivin, J. (2003). Monetary policy in a data-rich environment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 525–546.
Bernoth, K., & von Hagen, J. (2004). The Euribor futures market: Efficiency and the impact of ECB policy announcements. International Finance, 7(1), 1–24.
Bini Smaghi, L. (2005). Inflation, expectations and current challenges to monetary policy. Speech at ‘The European Inflation-Linked Conference’ in Rome, 10 October. http://www.ecb.int/press/key/date/2005/html/sp051010_1.en.html.
Blattner, T., Catenaro, M., Ehrmann, M., Strauch, R., & Turunen, J. (2008). The predictability of monetary policy. European Central Bank Occasional Paper No. 83.
Blinder, A. S. (2007). Monetary policy by committee: Why and how? European Journal of Political Economy, 23(1), 106–123.
Blinder, A. S., Ehrmann, M., Fratzscher, M., De Haan, J., & Jansen, D. (2008). Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(4), 910–945.
Bulíř, A., Čihák, M., & Šmídková, K. (2008). Writing clearly: ECB’s monetary policy communication. IMF Working Paper No. 08/252.
Cecchetti, S. C., & Schoenholtz, K. L. (2008). How central bankers see it: The first decade of ECB policy and beyond. NBER Working Paper 14489.
Coffinet, J., & Gouteron, S. (2007). Euro area market reactions to the monetary developments press release. ECB Working Paper No. 792.
Connolly, E., & Kohler, M. (2004). News and interest rate expectations: A study of six central banks. In C. Kent & S. Guttman (Eds.), The future of inflation targeting (pp. 108–134). Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.
Conrad, C., & Lamla, M. J. (2007). The high-frequency response of the EUR-US dollar exchange rate to ECB monetary policy announcements. KOF (Swiss Economic Institute) Working Paper No. 07-174.
De Haan, J. (2008). The effect of ECB communication on interest rates: An assessment. Review of International Organizations, 3, 375–398.
De Haan, J., Eijffinger, S. C. W., & Waller, S. (2005). The European Central Bank: Credibility, transparency, and centralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2005). How should central banks communicate? ECB Working Paper No. 557.
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2007a). Communication by central bank committee members: Different strategies, same effectiveness? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39(2-3), 509–541.
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2007b). The timing of central bank communication. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(1), 124–145.
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2009). Explaining monetary policy in press conferences. International Journal of Central Banking, 5(2), 41–84.
European Central Bank. (2001). A guide to eurosystem staff macroeconomic projection exercises. http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/staffprojectionsguideen.pdf.
Faust, J., & Svensson, L. E. O. (2001). Transparency and credibility: Monetary policy with unobservable goals. International Economic Review, 42(2), 369–397.
Fratzscher, M. (2006). On the long-term effectiveness of exchange rate communication and interventions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(1), 146–167.
Gamber, E. N., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Are the fed’s inflation forecasts still superior to the private sector’s? Journal of Macroeconomics, 31(2), 240–251.
Geraats, P. (2002). Central bank transparency. The Economic Journal, 112(483), 532–565.
Gosselin, P., Lotz, A., Wyplosz, C. (2007). Interest rate signals and central bank transparency. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6454.
Graber, D. A. (2004). Methodological developments in political communication research. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 45–67). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heinemann, F., & Ullrich, K. (2007). Does it pay to watch central bankers lips? The information content of ECB wording. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 143(2), 155–185.
Issing, O. (2005). Communication, transparency, accountability––monetary policy in the twenty-first century. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87(2), 65–83.
Jansen, D. (2008). Has the clarity of Humphrey–Hawkins testimonies affected volatility in financial markets? De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 185.
Jansen, D., & De Haan, J. (2005). Talking heads: The effects of ECB statements on the Euro-Dollar exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(2), 343–361.
Jansen, D., & De Haan, J. (2006). Look who’s talking: ECB communication during the first years of EMU. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 11(3), 219–228.
Jansen, D., & De Haan, J. (2007a). Were verbal efforts to support the euro effective? A high-frequency analysis of ECB statements. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(1), 245–259.
Jansen, D., & De Haan, J. (2007b). The importance of being vigilant: Has ECB communication influenced euro area inflation expectations? CESifo Working Paper No. 2154.
Jansen, D., & De Haan, J. (2009). Has ECB communication been helpful in predicting interest rate decisions? An evaluation of the early years of the economic and monetary union. Applied Economics, 41(16), 1995–2003.
Kahnemann, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
King, M. (2005). Monetary policy: practice ahead of theory, Mais Lecture, delivered at Cass Business School, London. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2005/speech245.pdf.
Kohn, D. L., & Sack, B. (2004). Central bank talk: Does it matter and why? In: Macroeconomics, Monetary Policy, and Financial Stability (pp. 175–206), Ottawa: Bank of Canada.
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
Musard-Gies, M. (2006). Do ECB’s statements steer short-term and long-term interest rates in the Euro-zone? The Manchester School, 74(supplement), 116–139.
Romer, C., & Romer, D. (2000). Federal Reserve information and the behavior of interest rates. American Economic Review, 90(3), 429–457.
Rosa, C., & Verga, G. (2007). On the consistency and effectiveness of central bank communication: Evidence from the ECB. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(1), 146–175.
Rosa, C., & Verga, G. (2008). The impact of central bank announcements on asset prices in real time. International Journal of Central Banking, 4(2), 175–217.
Sebestyén, S., & Sicilia, J. (2005). Is the external communication of the European central bank effective? mimeo.
Svensson, L. E. O. (2006). Social value of public information: Morris and Shin (2002) is actually pro transparency, not con. American Economic Review, 96(1), 448–451.
Swanson, E. T. (2006). Federal reserve transparency and financial market forecasts of short-term interest rates. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(3), 791–819.
Trichet, J. C. (2005). Monetary policy and ‘Credible Alertness’, intervention at the panel discussion “Monetary Policy Strategies: A Central Bank Panel”, at the Symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, 27 August 2005. http://www.ecb.int/press/key/date/2005/html/sp050827.en.html.
Trichet, J. C. (2006). Activism and alertness in monetary policy, lecture at the conference on ‘Central banks in the 21st Century’ organised by the Banco de Espana, 8 June. http://www.ecb.int/press/key/date/2006/html/sp060608_1.en.html.
Ullrich, K. (2008). Inflation expectations of experts and ECB communication. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 19, 93–108.
van der Cruijsen, C. A. B., & Eijffinger, S. C. W. (2010). The economic impact of central bank transparency: A survey, forthcoming. In P. Siklos, M. Bohl, & M. Wohar (Eds.), Challenges in central banking: The present institutional environment and the forces affecting the conduct of monetary policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Cruijsen, C. A. B., Eijffinger, S. C. W., Hoogduin, L. H. (2008). Optimal central bank transparency, De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 178. Journal of Economic Psychology, forthcoming.
van der Cruijsen, C. A. B., Jansen, D., De Haan, J. (2010). How much does the public know about the ECB’s monetary policy? Evidence from a survey of Dutch households. De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 252.
Woodford, M. (2005). Central-bank communication and policy effectiveness. In The Greenspan era: Lessons for the future (pp. 399–474). Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Haan, J., Jansen, DJ. (2010). The Communication Policy of the European Central Bank: An Overview of the First Decade. In: Haan, J., Berger, H. (eds) The European Central Bank at Ten. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14237-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14237-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14236-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14237-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)