Skip to main content

A Decidable Class of Nested Iterated Schemata

  • Conference paper
Book cover Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many problems can be specified by patterns of propositional formulae depending on a parameter, e.g. the specification of a circuit usually depends on the number of bits of its input. We define a logic whose formulae, called iterated schemata, allow to express such patterns. Schemata extend propositional logic with indexed propositions, e.g.P i, P i + 1, P 1 or P n, and with generalized connectives, e.g. \(\bigwedge_{\rm i = 1}^n\), or \(\bigvee_{\rm i = 1}^n\), where n is an (unbound) integer variable called a parameter. The expressive power of iterated schemata is strictly greater than propositional logic: it is even out of the scope of first-order logic. We define a proof procedure, called dpll  ⋆ , that can prove that a schema is satisfiable for at least one value of its parameter, in the spirit of the dpll procedure [9]. But proving that a schema is unsatisfiable for every value of the parameter, is undecidable [1] so dpll  ⋆  does not terminate in general. Still, dpll  ⋆  terminates for schemata of a syntactic subclass called regularly nested.

This work has been partly funded by the project ASAP of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0407-01).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aravantinos, V., Caferra, R., Peltier, N.: A Schemata Calculus For Propositional Logic. In: Giese, M., Waaler, A. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2009. LNCS, vol. 5607, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Aravantinos, V., Caferra, R., Peltier, N.: A Decidable Class of Nested Iterated Schemata (extended version). Technical report, Laboratory of Informatics of Grenoble (2010), http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4251

  3. Boyer, R.S., Moore, J.S.: A Computational Logic. Academic Press, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradfield, J., Stirling, C.: Modal Mu-Calculi. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J.F.A.K., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, vol. 3. Elsevier Science Inc., New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bundy, A.: The Automation of Proof by Mathematical Induction. In: [13], pp. 845–911

    Google Scholar 

  6. Comon, H.: Inductionless induction. In: [13], ch. 14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, D.: Theorem proving in arithmetic without multiplication. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 7. Edinburgh University Press (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corcoran, J.: Schemata: the concept of schema in the history of logic. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12(2), 219–240 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A Machine Program for Theorem Proving. Communication of the ACM 5, 394–397 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R.: Finite-Model Theory - A Personal Perspective. Theoretical Computer Science 116, 3–31 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapur, D., Subramaniam, M.: Extending Decision Procedures with Induction Schemes. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) CADE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1831, pp. 324–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Orevkov, V.P.: Proof schemata in Hilbert-type axiomatic theories. Journal of Mathematical Sciences 55(2), 1610–1620 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.): Handbook of Automated Reasoning (in 2 volumes). Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aravantinos, V., Caferra, R., Peltier, N. (2010). A Decidable Class of Nested Iterated Schemata. In: Giesl, J., Hähnle, R. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14203-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14203-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14203-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics