Skip to main content

Characterising Responsibility in Organisational Structures: The Problem of Many Hands

  • Conference paper
Book cover Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Sometimes it is impossible to attribute responsibility to individuals when something goes wrong, or right, especially when many different agents are involved. Moral norms may dictate that certain events are not to happen, but responsibility can only be attributed to an agent if this agent was able to do the right thing, she knew what she ought to do, and she did not accidentally fail in completing her task. The fact that we cannot attribute responsibility for certain unfortunate events due to the absence of these conditions is called the problem of many hands. This contribution presents a logical analysis of the problem of many hands in the framework of XSTIT with intentions, as developed by Jan Broersen. The problem of many hands is analysed in terms of an inference from the existence of a norm and the fact that all agents are acting responsibly to the conclusion that the norm is obeyed. To make that inference valid, additional assumptions are necessary, to ensure that the fairness conditions are met. As the formal analysis shows, tasks can be distributed so as to minimize the gap in this inference, but it cannot be completely bridged: at some point we have to acknowledge that moral responsibility falls short of guaranteeing moral norm fulfilment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anscombe, G.E.M.: Intention. Basil Blackwell, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bovens, M.: The Quest for Responsibility. Cambridge UP, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broersen, J.: Deontic epistemic stit-logic distinguishing modes of mens rea. Journal of Applied Logic (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42(3), 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. de Lima, T., Royakkers, L., Dignum, F.: A Logic for Reasoning about Responsibility. Journal of the IGPL (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grossi, D., Royakkers, L., Dignum, F.: Organisational Structure and Responsibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15, 223–249 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.J.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kutz, C.: Complicity. Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge UP, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, T.J., Reed, C.: Delegation and Responsibility. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1986, pp. 367–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Santos, F., Jones, A.J.I., Carmo, J.: Responsibility for Action in Organisations: A Formal Model. In: Holmström-Hintikka, G., Tuomela, R. (eds.) Contemporary Action Theory. Synthese Library, vol I, vol. 267, pp. 333–348. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson, D.F.: Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands. The American Political Science Review 74(4), 905–916 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L.: Ethics, Engineering and Technology. Blackwell, Malden (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  13. van den Hoven, M.J.: Moral Responsibility, Public Office and Information Technology. In: Snellen, I.T.M., van den Donk, W.B.H.J. (eds.) Public Administration in an Information Age, pp. 97–112. IOS, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mastop, R. (2010). Characterising Responsibility in Organisational Structures: The Problem of Many Hands. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14183-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14182-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14183-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics