Skip to main content

Concurrent Abstract Predicates

  • Conference paper
ECOOP 2010 – Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6183))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Abstraction is key to understanding and reasoning about large computer systems. Abstraction is simple to achieve if the relevant data structures are disjoint, but rather difficult when they are partially shared, as is often the case for concurrent modules. We present a program logic for reasoning abstractly about data structures that provides a fiction of disjointness and permits compositional reasoning. The internal details of a module are completely hidden from the client by concurrent abstract predicates. We reason about a module’s implementation using separation logic with permissions, and provide abstract specifications for use by client programs using concurrent abstract predicates. We illustrate our abstract reasoning by building two implementations of a lock module on top of hardware instructions, and two implementations of a concurrent set module on top of the lock module.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bierhoff, K., Aldrich, J.: Modular typestate checking of aliased objects. In: OOPSLA, pp. 301–320 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyland, J.: Checking interference with fractional permissions. In: Cousot, R. (ed.) SAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2694. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Calcagno, C., Gardner, P., Zarfaty, U.: Local reasoning about data update. Festschrift Computation, Meaning and Logic: Articles dedicated to Gordon Plotkin, 172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calcagno, C., O’Hearn, P.W., Yang, H.: Local action and abstract separation logic. In: Symp. on Logic in Comp. Sci (LICS 2007), pp. 366–378 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dinsdale-Young, T., Dodds, M., Gardner, P., Parkinson, M., Vafeiadis, V.: Concurrent abstract predicates. Technical Report 777, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dinsdale-Young, T., Gardner, P., Wheelhouse, M.: Local reasoning about a concurrent B*-list algorithm. Talk and unpublished report (2009), http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~pg/

  7. Dinsdale-Young, T., Gardner, P., Wheelhouse, M.: Locality refinement. Technical Report DTR10-8, Imperial College London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dodds, M., Feng, X., Parkinson, M., Vafeiadis, V.: Deny-guarantee reasoning. In: Castagna, G. (ed.) ESOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5502, pp. 363–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, X.: Local rely-guarantee reasoning. In: POPL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feng, X., Ferreira, R., Shao, Z.: On the relationship between concurrent separation logic and assume-guarantee reasoning. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 173–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gotsman, A., Berdine, J., Cook, B., Rinetzky, N., Sagiv, M.: Local reasoning for storable locks and threads. In: Shao, Z. (ed.) APLAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4807, pp. 19–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Haack, C., Huisman, M., Hurlin, C.: Reasoning about Java’s Reentrant Locks. In: Ramalingam, G. (ed.) APLAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5356, pp. 171–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Herlihy, M., Shavit, N.: The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herlihy, M.P., Wing, J.M.: Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects. TOPLAS 12(3), 463–492 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hobor, A., Appel, A.W., Nardelli, F.Z.: Oracle semantics for concurrent separation logic. In: Drossopoulou, S. (ed.) ESOP 2008. LNCS, vol. 4960, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishtiaq, S.S., O’Hearn, P.W.: BI as an assertion language for mutable data structures. In: POPL, pp. 14–26 (January 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs, B., Piessens, F.: Modular full functional specification and verification of lock-free data structures. Technical Report CW 551, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Computer Science (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones, C.B.: Annoted bibliography on rely/guarantee conditions (2007), http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/cliff.jones/ftp-stuff/rg-hist.pdf

  19. O’Hearn, P.W.: Resources, concurrency and local reasoning. TCS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parkinson, M., Bornat, R., O’Hearn, P.: Modular verification of a non-blocking stack. In: POPL, pp. 297–302 (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parkinson, M.J., Bierman, G.M.: Separation logic and abstraction. In: POPL, pp. 247–258 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinto, P.: Reasoning about BLink trees. Advanced masters ISO project, Imperial College London (2010), Supervised by Dinsdale-Young, Gardner and Wheelhouse

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vafeiadis, V., Parkinson, M.: A marriage of rely/Guarantee and separation logic. In: Caires, L., Vasconcelos, V.T. (eds.) CONCUR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4703, pp. 256–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dinsdale-Young, T., Dodds, M., Gardner, P., Parkinson, M.J., Vafeiadis, V. (2010). Concurrent Abstract Predicates. In: D’Hondt, T. (eds) ECOOP 2010 – Object-Oriented Programming. ECOOP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14107-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14107-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14106-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14107-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics