Reading Braille and Tactile Ink-Print on a Planar Tactile Display

  • Denise Prescher
  • Oliver Nadig
  • Gerhard Weber
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6180)


Reading characters by fingers depends on the tactile features of the medium in use. Braille displays were often found to be slower than Braille on paper. We study reading Braille on a novel planar tactile display by conducting three reading tests. A first study compares the reading speed on four different devices, namely paper, 40 cell Braille display and two varied conditions on the planar pin device. In a second study we isolate the factor of ‘equidistance’ which is due to the design of our planar tactile display. Our intention is to find out if equidistant Braille can be as fast as standard Braille. Because of the two-dimensionality, the pin device also can show graphics and tactile ink-print. The latter was evaluated with blind subjects in the third study.


equidistant Braille tactile ink-print blind users planar tactile display reading speed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chepaitis, A., Griffiths, A., Wyatt, H., O’Connell, W.: Evaluation of tactile fonts for use by a visually impaired elderly population. Visual Impairment Research 6(2&3), 111–134 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidson, P., Appelle, S., Haber, R.: Haptic Scanning of Braille Cells by Low- and High-Proficiency Blind Readers. Research in Developmental Disabilities 13, 99–111 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Denninghaus, E.: Die Förderung der Lesegeschwindigkeit bei blinden und sehbehinderten Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. In: blind-sehbehindert 116, Zeitschrift für das Sehgeschädigten-Bildungswesen,Verein zur Förderung der Blindenbildung, Hannover pp. 95–100 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diggle, T., Kurniawan, S., Evans, D., Blenkhorn, P.: An Analysis of Layout Errors in Word Processed Documents Produced by Blind People. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L. (eds.) ICCHP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2398, pp. 587–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knowlton, M., Wetzel, R.: Braille Reading Rates as a Function of Reading Tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 90(3), 227–236 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lorimer, P.: Hand techniques in reading braille; synthesis of spatial and verbal elements of reading. British Journal of Visual Impairment 20(2), 76–79 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyers, E., Ethington, D., Ashcroft, S.: Readability of Braille as a Function of Three Spacing Variables. Journal of Applied Psychology 42(3), 163–165 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Millar, S.: Prose reading by touch: The role of stimulus quality, orthography and context. British Journal of Psychology 79, 87–103 (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pester, E., Petrosko, J.: Optimum size and spacing for introducing blind adults to the Braille code. Re:View 25(1), 15–22 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrie, H., Morley, S.: The Use of Non-Speech Sounds in Non-Visual Interfaces to the MS-Windows GUI for Blind Computer Users. In: International Conference on Auditory Display, Glasgow (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramstein, C.: Combining Haptic and Braille Technologies: Design Issues and Pilot Study. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Assistive technologies, pp. 37–44 (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schiewe, M., Köhlmann, W., Nadig, O., Weber, G.: What You Feel is What You Get: Mapping GUIs on Planar Tactile Displays. In: Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 564–573 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schürings, I.: Experimentelle Untersuchung der taktilen Erkennbarkeit und Verwechselbarkeit von Blindenschriftzeichen. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 1987, Band XXXIV, Heft 2, 318–330 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schweikhardt, W.: Access to the European Videotex-systems by Blind Subscribers. Communication Systems for the Blind. In: Proceedings of a European Workshop in Florence 1986, Verlag der Deutschen Blindenstudienanstalt e.V. Marburg, pp. 195–202 (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taras, C., Ertl, T.: Interaction with Colored Graphical Representations on Braille Devices. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5614, pp. 164–173 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Völkel, T., Weber, G., Baumann, U.: Tactile Graphics Revised: The Novel BrailleDis 9000 Pin-Matrix Device with Multitouch Input. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 835–842. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wetzel, R., Knowlton, M.: A Comparison of Print and Braille Reading Rates on Three Reading Tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 94(3), 146–154 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Prescher
    • 1
  • Oliver Nadig
    • 2
  • Gerhard Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Angewandte InformatikTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche Blindenstudienanstalt e.V.MarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations