Advertisement

Evaluation of WordTree System with Motor Disabled Users

  • Georges Badr
  • Mathieu Raynal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6180)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a novel interaction technique to use with a prediction list. Our aim is to optimize the use of this assistive aid. A prediction list is generally used to reduce effort by presenting a list of candidate words that may continue the prefix of the user. However, this technique presents a disadvantage: sometimes the word that the user is aiming to write is not presented in the list. The user has to continue his typing manually. Our technique allows the user to click on any letter in a word of the list so that the substring from this letter is inserted in the text. We also present the experiments carried out to compare our system to the classical list.

Keywords

Soft keyboard interaction word list prediction motor disabled people 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Harbusch, K., Hasan, S., Hoffmann, H., Kühn, M., Schüler, B.: Domain-specific disambiguation for typing with ambiguous keyboards. In: Proceedings of the 2003 EACL Workshop on Language Modeling For Text Entry Methods. ACL Workshops, pp. 67–74. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masui, T.: An efficient text input method for pen-based computers. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, C., Seisenbacher, G., Edlemayer, G., Zagler, W.L.: First User Test Results with the Predictive Typing System FASTYGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keystrokes on-screen keyboard, user manual, http://www.assistiveware.com/files/KeyStrokesXmanualA4.pdf
  5. 5.
    Wandmacher, T., Antoine, J.-Y., Poirier, F., Departe, J.-P.: SIBYLLE, An Assistive Communication System Adapting to the Context and Its User. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 1(1), 1–30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aliprandi, C., Carmignani, N., Mancarella, P.: An inflected-Sensitive Letter and Word Prediction System. International Journal of Computing & Information Sciences 5(2), 79–85 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunnicutt, S., Nozadze, L., Chikoidze, G.: Russian Word Prediction with Morphological Support. In: 5th International Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation, Tbilisi, Georgia (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badr, G., Raynal, M.: WordTree: Results of a Word Prediction System Presented thanks to a Tree. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, San Diego. LNCS, vol. 5616, pp. 463–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georges Badr
    • 1
  • Mathieu Raynal
    • 1
  1. 1.IHCS / IRITUniversité Paul SabatierToulouse cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations