Towards the Convergence of Web 2.0 and Semantic Web for E-Inclusion

  • Laura Burzagli
  • Andrea Como
  • Francesco Gabbanini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6179)


The paper discusses a research approach to achieve the “wider inclusion objectives” reported in the second part of the Riga declaration. The approach is based on the convergence of two forms of intelligence on the web, given by Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web. While Web 2.0 encompasses social phenomena, often undervalued in the field of e-Inclusion (exchange and collection of large amount of information), Semantic Web is designed for interlinking and reusing structured information. The paper outlines a software architecture for the exploitation of the above concepts and gives an example of a possible application built on top of the architecture, in the domain of inclusive e-Tourism, enlightening benefits that come by the adoption of the approach, with respect to current trip planning systems.


Web 2.0 Semantic Web e-Inclusion Ontology Design for All 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burzagli, L., Gabbanini, F.: Intelligence on the web and e-inclusion. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 641–649. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heath, T., Motta, E.: Ease of interaction plus ease of integration: Combining Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web in a reviewing site. Web Semantics 6(1), 76–83 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yesilada, Y., Harper, S.: Web 2.0 and the semantic web: hindrance or opportunity? In: W4A - international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility 2007 (2008); SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing (90), 19–31Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ankolekar, A., Krotzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D.: The two cultures: Mashing up Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web. Web Semantics 6(1), 70–75 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, M.: Accessibility of emerging rich web technologies: web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: W4A ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pp. 93–98. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, T.: Collective knowledge systems: Where the social web meets the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics 6(1), 4–13 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burzagli, L., Emiliani, P.L., Gabbanini, F.: Design for all in action: An example of analysis and implementation. Expert Systems with Applications 36(1), 985–994 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shayeganfar, F., Anjomshoaa, A., Tjoa, A.: A smart indoor navigation solution based on building information model and google android. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, ch. 157, pp. 1050–1056. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Burzagli
    • 1
  • Andrea Como
    • 1
  • Francesco Gabbanini
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Applied PhysicsItalian National Research CouncilSesto Fiorentino, FirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations