Advertisement

A Social Approach to Accessible Social Networking Using the CAT Model

  • Jennifer George
  • Gilbert Cockton
  • Thomas Greenough
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6179)

Abstract

The social model of disability looks beyond medical and technical solution moving towards social approach. This paper applies the label and table attributes of the CAT models to understand the social setting of the child with the disability together with the care circle. It goes on to understand their social needs and identifies accessibility challenges in communication between members of the care circle. Evaluation is carried out in both a computer and Internet based environment and a traditional communication environment. Finally brief guidelines are drawn upon which an accessible social network based design solution could be built for the reduction of disability of children with motor impairment.

Keywords

Social model CAT Model Accessibility Social Networking Social Inclusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    UPIAS, Fundamental principles of disability. UPIAS (Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation), London (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes, C.: Disabled People in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation. Hurst & Co., London (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hersh, M.A., Johnson, M.A.: On Modelling Assistive Technology Systems Part I: Modelling Framework. Technology and Disability 20(3), 193–215 (2008a)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, A.M., Hussey, S.M.: Assistive technology: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Mosby Inc., St. Louis (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scherer, M.J., Craddock, G.: Matching person and technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology and Disability 14, 125–13 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), Geneva (2010), http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ (accessed January 30, 2010)
  7. 7.
    Hersh, M.A., Johnson, M.A.: On Modelling Assistive Technology Systems Part 2: Applications of the Comprehensive Assistive Technology Model. Technology and Disability 20(4), 251–270 (2008b)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    George, J., Cockton, G.: Towards Comprehensive ICF Compatible Sociodigital Approaches to Choice and Use of Assistive Technology for Young Children. In: Dias, M.S., Hadjileontiadis, L., Barroso, J. (eds.) Proc. DSAI 2009, pp. 87–94 (2009) ISBN 978-972-669-913-2Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    AbilityNet, State of the eNations Report (2008), http://www.abilitynet.org.uk/enation85 (accessed December 2, 2009)
  10. 10.
    AbilityNet, Makayla Lewis on Social Networking for people with Cerebal Palsy (2009), http://www.abilitynet.org.uk/accessibility2/2009/09/17/makayla-lewis-on-social-networking-for-people-with-cerebal-palsy/ (accessed January 29, 2010)
  11. 11.
    World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative (2009), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ (accessed March 30, 2010)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer George
    • 1
  • Gilbert Cockton
    • 2
  • Thomas Greenough
    • 2
  1. 1.SAE InstituteLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.School of DesignNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations