Skip to main content

Effects of Force Feedback and Arm Compliance on Teleoperation for a Hygiene Task

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations (EuroHaptics 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6191))

Abstract

Teleoperated assistive robots with compliant arms may be well-suited to tasks that require contact with people and operation within human environments. However, little is known about the effects of force feedback and compliance on task performance. In this paper, we present a pilot study that we conducted to investigate the effects of force feedback and arm compliance on the performance of a simulated hygiene task. In this study, each subject (n=12) teleoperated a compliant arm to clean dry-erase marks off a mannequin with or without force feedback, and with lower or higher stiffness settings for the robot’s arm. Under all four conditions, subjects successfully removed the dry-erase marks, but trials performed with stiffer settings were completed significantly faster. The presence of force feedback significantly reduced the mean contact force, although the trials took significantly longer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zinn, M., Khatib, O., Roth, B., Salisbury, J.: Playing it safe [human-friendly robots]. IEEE Robo. and Auto. Mag. 11(2), 12–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haddadin, S., et al.: The role of the robot mass and velocity in physical human-robot interaction - part ii: Constrained blunt impacts. In: ICRA, pp. 1339–1345 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pratt, G., Williamson, M.: Series elastic actuators. In: IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 399–406 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shin, D., Khatib, O., Cutkosky, M.: Design methodologies of a hybrid actuation approach for a human-friendly robot. In: ICRA, pp. 4369–4374 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schiavi, R., et al.: Vsa-ii: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans. In: ICRA, pp. 2171–2176 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jain, A., Kemp, C.C.: Pulling Open Novel Doors and Drawers with Equilibrium Point Control. In: Proc. IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. Hum. Robo. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. King, C.H., et al.: Tactile feedback induces reduced grasping force in robot-assisted surgery. IEEE T. Haptics 2, 103–110 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tholey, G., Desai, J.P., Castellanos, A.E.: Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery. Annals of Surgery 241(1), 102–109 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner, C., Stylopoulos, N., Howe, R.: The role of force feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. In: Haptics Symp., pp. 68–74 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gwilliam, J.C., et al.: Effects of haptic and graphical force feedback on teleoperated palpation. In: ICRA, pp. 677–682 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tavakoli, M., Howe, R.D.: Haptic Effects of Surgical Teleoperator Flexibility. Int. J. Robot. Res. (2009) 0278364909101231

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wyrobek, K., et al.: Towards a personal robotics development platform: Rationale and design of an intrinsically safe personal robot. In: ICRA, pp. 2165–2170 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kremer, P., et al.: Multimodal telepresent control of dlr’s rollin’ justin. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robo. Auto., pp. 1601–1602 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammel, J., et al.: Clinical evaluation of a desktop robotic assistant. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 26(3), 1–16 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Romilly, D., et al.: A functional task analysis and motion sim. for the development of a powered upper-limb orthosis. IEEE T. Rehab. Eng. 2(3), 119–129 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Topping, M.: The development of handy 1. a robotic system to assist the severely disabled. In: Int. Conf. Rehab. Robo., pp. 244–249 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman, J., Flash, T.: Task-Dependent Selection of Grasp Kinematics and Stiffness in Human Object Manipulation. Cortex 43, 444–460 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

King, CH., Killpack, M.D., Kemp, C.C. (2010). Effects of Force Feedback and Arm Compliance on Teleoperation for a Hygiene Task. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds) Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations. EuroHaptics 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6191. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14063-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14064-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics