Skip to main content

Three Roots for Leibniz’s Contribution to the Computational Conception of Reason

  • Conference paper
Programs, Proofs, Processes (CiE 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6158))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that Leibniz’s contribution to what we may call today the computational conception of reason must be inscribed in three different roots: 1) the combinatory tradition coming from the XIII century, 2) XVII century attempts at constructing an artificial universal and philosophical language, and 3) the Hobbesian conception of reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon, F.: The Advancement of Learning. In: The works of Francis Bacon. Faksimile Neudruck der Ausgabe von Spedding. Ellis und Heath, vol. III, pp. 260–491. Stuttgart Bad/Frommann, London/Cannstatt (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becher, J.: Character, pro notítia linguarum universali, inventum steganographicum hactenus inauditam quo quilibet suam legendo vernaculam diversas imo omnes linguas, unius etiam diet informatione, explicare ac intelligere potest. Francofurti: sumtibus Johanis Wilh. Amonii et Wilhelmi Serlini, typis Johannis Georgii Spörlin (1661)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, C.: The Universal Character, by which all the Nations in the World may understand one anothers Conceptions, Reading out on one Common Writing their own Mother Tongues. T. Maxey, for W. Weekly, Longon (1657)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breidert, W.: Les mathématiques et la méthode mathématique chez Hobbes. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 129, 415–431 (1979)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Carreras y Artau, Tomás/Joaquín, Historia de la filosofia espanõla. Filosofia cristiana de los siglos XII a XV. I. Madrid: Real Academia de Ciências Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassirer, E. (1923-29): La philosophie des formes symboliques. I. Le langage (Trad. Ole Hansen Love, Jean Lacoste). III. La phénoménologie de la connaissance (Trad. Claude Fronty). Paris: Minuit (1972); Orig.: Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Erster teil. Die Spache (Berlin, 1923). Dritter Teil. Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis (Berlin, 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Couturat, L.: La logique de Leibniz d’après des documents inédits. Alcan, Paris (1901)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cram, D.: George Dalgarno on Ars Signorum and Wilkins Essay. In: Koerner (ed.) Progress in Linguistic Historiography, pp. 113–121. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dalgarno, G. (1661): Ars Signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philophica. In: The Works of George Dalgarno of Aberdeen, pp. 1–82. Constable, Eddinburg (1834)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Descartes, R.: Euvres de Descartes. Ed. Charles Adam Paul Tannery. Vrin, Paris (1964 76)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan. Ed. by C. B. Macpherson. Penguin, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hobbes, T.: Human Nature. Or the Fundamental Elements of Policy. In: Hobbes, T. (ed.) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Ed. by Sir William Moleswort, London, vol. 4 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leibniz, G.: Wilhelm Leibniz Samtliche Schrifften und Briefe. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Reihe I VI. Reichl, Darmstadt (1923 segs)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leibniz, Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque royale de Hannover par Louis Couturat. Alcan, Paris (1903)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Hrsg v. Carl Immanuel Gerhardt. pp. 1–7. Olms, Hildesheim (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Llull, R. (1308): Ars Brevis (tradução, introdução e notas de Armand Llinarès). La éditions du Cerf, Paris (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mersenne, M. (1636): Harmonie universelle contenant la théorie et la pratique de la musique, 1636. Ed. facs. de l’exemplaire conservé à la Bibliothèque des Arts et Métiers et annoté par l’autheur. Introduction par François Lesure. Vols. 1, 3. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pombo, O.: Linguagem e verdade em Hobbes. Filosofia 1, 45–61 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pombo, O.: Leibniz and the problem of a Universal Language. Nodus Publikationen, Münster (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pombo, O.: The Leibnizian theory of representativity of the sign. In: Niederehe, H.J., Koerner, K. (eds.) History and Historiography of linguistics, II, pp. 447–459. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pombo, O.: La Théorie Leibnizienne de la Pensée Aveugle en tant que Perspective sur quelques-unes des Apories Linguistiques de la Modernité. Cahiers Ferdinand Saussure 51, 63–75 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rossi, P., Universalis, C.: Arti Mnemoniche e Logica Combinatoria da Lullo a Leibniz. Riccardo Ricciardi, Milano (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Somerset, E.W. (1663): A Century of the Names and Scantlings of such Inventions, as at Present I can call to Mind to Have Tried and Perfected. Printed by J. Grismond and reprinted by J. Adlard, London (1813)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ward, S.: Vindicae academiarum. Containing Some Briefe Animadversions Upon Mr. Websters Book. Stiled. The Examination of Academies. Together with an Appendix Concerning what Mr. Hobbes, and Mr. Dell have Published on the Argument. Leonard Lichfield for Thomas Robinson, Oxford (1654)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkins, J.: An Essay Towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. S. Gellibrand & J. Martyn, London (1668)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pombo, O. (2010). Three Roots for Leibniz’s Contribution to the Computational Conception of Reason. In: Ferreira, F., Löwe, B., Mayordomo, E., Mendes Gomes, L. (eds) Programs, Proofs, Processes. CiE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6158. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13962-8_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13962-8_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13961-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13962-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics