Skip to main content

The Process Architect in Action: Making a Process Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3568 Accesses

Abstract

The design principles outlined in the previous chapter may be helpful when making process agreements, but of course the main question remains how such agreements are made. In this chapter we will answer this question as follows. (Both the current chapter and Chap. 5 are partly based on actual process designs and draft process designs that we made in the past See [2–13].).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [213].

  2. 2.

    Ref. [16].

References

  1. Curran D, Sebenius JK, Watkins M (2004) Two paths to peace: contrasting George Mitchell in Northern Ireland with Richard Holbrooke in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Negot J 20(4):513–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Bruijn JA, Geut L, Kort MB et al (1999) Procesvoering besluitvorming nationale luchthaven, Den Haag, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (1995) Ontwerp besluitvormingstraject Maasvlakte II, Delft, commissioned by GHR

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (1996) De implementatie van het Verdrag van Malta: Een ontwerp voor procesmatige sturing, Delft, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (1997) Ontwerp van een protocol voor de toetsing van ALARA-inspanningen, Delft, commissioned by Foundation Merk Artikel

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (1999) Procesbenadering voor productgericht milieubeleid, Delft, commissioned by VNO-NCW

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (1999) Kwaliteitssysteem beleid en beleidsprocessen, Delft, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Bruijn JA de, ten Heuvelhof EF (1999) Package covenant II: clustering and process of reporting protocol. Report for the Ministery of Housing, Environment and Spatial Planning and the Dutch Packaging Industry, Delft, commissioned by Foundation Verpakking en Milieu

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (2000) Procesontwerp onderzoek reisgedrag: NS reizigers, streekvervoer en VSV+, Delft, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (2000) Procesafspraken voor de onderhandelingen tussen het ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschappen en de openbaar vervoerbedrijven over een nieuwe reisvoorziening voor studenten, Delft, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF, de Vlaam HIM (1999) Interconnection disputes and the role of the government between substances and process. Commun Strateg 34:295–317

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF, van Eeten MJG (1997) Quick scan van procesontwerpen voor vervlechting van dialoog, onderzoek en besluitvorming rondom TNLI, Delft, commissioned by TNLI

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Bruijn JA, in ’t Veld RJ et al (1999) Procesvoering projectdirectie Mainport Rotterdam, The Hague, commissioned by project executive board Mainport Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher R, Ury W (1981) Getting to yes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Manage Rev 73(2):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  16. Termeer CJAM (1993) Dynamiek en inertie rondom mestbeleid. Vuga Uitgeverij, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van Twist MJW, Edelenbos J, van der Broek M (1998) In dilemma’s durven denken. Management en Organisatie 52(5):7–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst F. ten Heuvelhof .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bruijn, H., ten Heuvelhof, E.F., in ‘t Veld, R. (2010). The Process Architect in Action: Making a Process Design. In: Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13941-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics