Advertisement

Introduction: Process and Content

  • Hans de Bruijn
  • Ernst F. ten Heuvelhof
  • Roel in ‘t Veld
Chapter

Abstract

This book is about change. Change in complex issues. Change in complex issues always has the following three characteristics. Firstly, there are always multiple actors involved in this type of change. Put differently, the changes occur in a network of actors. These actors are, in a sense, dependent on each other. They need each other’s support in effectuating the change, or, at the very least, they should be prepared not to frustrate or obstruct the change. The second characteristic is that these actors negotiate with each other. One needs the other, and vice versa. This is why the actors negotiate. The negotiations are complex in themselves. It is very unlikely that one negotiation session is sufficient to shape the change in a detailed and definitive way. More likely, this will require a series of meetings. And thirdly, the negotiation is a process, a series of meetings that can stretch across a longer period of time, sometimes even years.

References

  1. 1.
    Buchanan DU, Huczynsky A (1997) Organizational behavior: an introductory text. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curran D, Sebenius JK, Watkins M (2004) Two paths to peace: contrasting George Mitchell in Northern Ireland with Richard Holbrooke in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Negotiat J 20(4):513–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawson P (2003) Reshaping change: a processual perspective. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Bruijn JA (2010) Managing professionals. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Bruijn JA, ten Heuvelhof EF (2008) Management in networks, on multi-actor decision making. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldsmith SG, Eggers WD (2004) Governing by network, the new shape of the public sector. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Innes JE (1996) Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Policy Anal 62(4):460–472Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ives PM (2003) Negotiating global change: progressive multilateralism in trade in telecommunications talks. Int Negotiat 8(1):43–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klijn EH (2008) Complexity theory and public administration: what’s new? Publ Manage Rev 10(3):299–317 (p 303)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabatier PA et al (2005) Swimming upstream, collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sebenius JK (1991) Designing negotiations toward a new regime. The case of global warming. Int Secur 15(4):110–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Susskind L, McKearnan S, Thomas-Larmer J (eds) (1999) The consensus building handbook. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watkins M (2003) Strategic simplification: toward a theory of modular design in negotiation. Int Negotiat 8(1):149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watkins M, Lundberg K (1998) Getting to the table in Oslo: driving forces and channel factors. Negotiat J 14(2):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans de Bruijn
    • 1
  • Ernst F. ten Heuvelhof
    • 1
  • Roel in ‘t Veld
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyBX DelftNetherlands
  2. 2.JH LeiderdorpNetherlands

Personalised recommendations