Business Conversation Manager: Facilitating People Interactions in Outsourcing Service Engagements

  • Hamid R. Motahari-Nezhad
  • Sven Graupner
  • Sharad Singhal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6189)


People involved in outsourcing services work through collaboration, conversations and ad-hoc activities and often follow guidelines that are described in best practice frameworks. There are two main issues hindering the efficient support of best practice frameworks in outsourcing services: lack of visibility into how the work is done that prevents repeatability, and conducting best practice processes that are ad-hoc and dynamically defined and refined. In this paper, we present Business Conversation Manager (BCM) that enables and drives business conversations among people around best practice processes. It supports the dynamic definition and refinement of a process in a collaborative and flexible manner. The ad-hoc processes are backed with a semi-formal process model that maintains the model of interactions and an execution engine. We present the implementation of a prototype BCM and its application in outsourcing services. It supports making processes from best practices among people more transparent, repeatable and traceable.


Ad-hoc Business Processes Collaborations Outsourcing Services 


  1. 1.
    Lee, J., Huynh, M.Q., Kwok, R.C., Pi, S.: IT outsourcing evolution—: past, present, and future. Commun. ACM 46(5), 84–89 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hendriks, L., Carr, M.: ITIL: Best Practice in IT Service Management. In: Van Bon, J. (Hrsg.) The Guide to IT Service Management, London u. a, Band 1, pp. 131–150 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hobson, S., Patil, S.: Public Disclosure versus Private Practice: Challenges in Business Process Management. In: Workshop on SOA, Globalization, People, & Work (SG-PAW 2009), Sweden (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Project Management Institute, The Project Management Body of Knowledge, PMBOK (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen, K.: An Introduction to the Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets. In: Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) APN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1492, pp. 237–292. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choo, Y.: Hierarchical Nets: A Structured Petri Net Approach to Concurrency, Technical Report CaltechCSTR:1982.5044-tr-82, California Institute of Technology (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graupner, S., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Singhal, S., Basu, S.: Making Process from Best practices Frameworks Actionable. In: DDBP 2009: Second International Workshop on Dynamic and Declarative Business Processes, Auckland, New Zealand, September 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    University of Karlsruhe, Semantic Media Wiki,
  9. 9.
    TeleManagement Forum, Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM) – The Business Process Framework,
  10. 10.
    Shangguan, Z., Gao, Z., Zhu, K.: Ontology-Based Process Modeling Using eTOM and ITIL. In: CONFENIS, vol. (2), pp. 1001–1010 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    WS-BPEL Extensions for People—BPEL4People: A Joint White Paper by IBM and SAP (July 2005),
  12. 12.
    Moran, T.P., Cozzi, A., Farrell, S.P.: Unified activity management: supporting people in e-business. ACM Commun. 48(12), 67–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Dustdar, S.: Caramba — A Process-Aware Collaboration System Supporting Ad hoc and Collaborative Processes in Virtual Teams. Distrib. Parallel Databases 15(1), 45–66 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPT flex Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Loosing Control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(2), 93–129 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Implementing dynamic flexibility in workflows using worklets. Report BPM-06-06. (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volere. List of Requirement Managemnt Tools,
  18. 18.
    HCi Journal, List of Document Management Software,
  19. 19.
    Dreiling, A.: Gravity – Collaborative Business Process Modelling within Google Wave, SAP Research (September 2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Itensil, Workflow-on-Wave (WoW),
  21. 21.
    Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.: Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. WileyBlackwell (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whittingham, K., Stolze, M., Ludwig, H.: The OpenWater Project - A substrate for process knowledge management tools, AAAI Technical Report SS-00-03 (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kreifelts, T., Hinrichs, E., Klein, K., Seuffert, P., Woetzel, G.: Experiences with the DOMINO office procedure system. In: Second Conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, The Netherlands, September 25 - 27 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid R. Motahari-Nezhad
    • 1
  • Sven Graupner
    • 1
  • Sharad Singhal
    • 1
  1. 1.Hewlett Packard LabsPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations