Advertisement

National Software Supported Quality Assurance Program in Digital Mammography: Experiences and Challenges

  • Christian Moll
  • Andreas Jahnen
  • Alex Meyer
  • Martine Grelot
  • Johannes Hermen
  • Carlo Back
  • Marie-Christine Wagnon
  • Norbert Rösch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6136)

Abstract

Quality assurance in digital mammography, especially in screening environments, needs a lot thoughtfulness. As the images are digital, it provides the possibility of the use of computer assisted tests. This requires adequate computer readable phantoms and powerful software tools, which should support the medical technical assistant (MTA) in carrying out the required constancy tests. An added value of software assisted quality assurance is the ability to generate reports and statistical evaluations of the collected results. The national mammography screening program in Luxembourg has established a sophisticated quality assurance program including automatic reading, ready to use reporting and tailored formation at a national scope during the last years. This paper reports our experiences during the implementation of this common national wide quality control system and discuss the challenges involved.

Keywords

Quality assurance constancy control automatic phantom reading 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    European Union: Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EUREF: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blendl, C., Hermann, K.-P., Mertelmeier, T.: PAS 1054 - Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren für digitale Mammographie Einrichtungen. NAR im DIN. Beuth Verlag, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ewen, et al.: European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening - Part B: Digital Mammography und die Abnahme und Konstanzprüfungen nach PAS 1054 im Vergleich. NAR im DIN. Beuth Verlag, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bijkerk, K.R., Lindeijer, J.M., Thijssen, M.A.O.: The CDMAM phantom: a contrast-detail phantom for mammography. Radiology 185, 395 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jahnen, A., Schilz, C., Shannoun, F., Schreiner, A., Hermen, J., Moll, C.: Optimage central organised image quality control including statistics and reporting. Radiation Protrotection Dosimetry 129(1-3), 253–257 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shannoun, F., Schanck, J.M., Scharpantgen, A., Wagnon, M.C., Ben Daoud, M., Back, C.: Organisational Aspects of Mammography Screening In Digital Settings: First Experiences of Luxembourg. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 129(1-3), 195–198 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jahnen, A., Hermen, J., Moll, C.: Optimage User Tutorial, Luxembourg (2009), http://santec.tudor.lu/project/optimage
  9. 9.
    Jerusalem, N., Moll, C., Jahnen, A.: Training in digital mammography through ImageJ. In: Proceedings of the ImageJ User and Developer Conference 2008, Luxembourg (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Moll
    • 1
  • Andreas Jahnen
    • 1
  • Alex Meyer
    • 2
  • Martine Grelot
    • 2
  • Johannes Hermen
    • 1
  • Carlo Back
    • 3
  • Marie-Christine Wagnon
    • 4
  • Norbert Rösch
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor, CR SANTECLuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.Entente des Hôpitaux Luxembourgeois, Physique MedicaleBertrangeLuxembourg
  3. 3.Direction de la Santé, Division de la RadioprotectionLuxembourgLuxembourg
  4. 4.Direction de la Santé, Programme MammographieLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations