Advertisement

Implementing Open Source Software Governance in Real Software Assurance Processes

  • Claudio A. Ardagna
  • Massimo Banzi
  • Ernesto Damiani
  • Fulvio Frati
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 51)

Abstract

Open Source is giving rise to new methodologies, competences and processes that organizations have to investigate both from the technical and the managerial point of view. Many organizations are studying the possibility to adopt open source products or migrate their systems to open frameworks, even for mission-critical application. In this paper we discuss a roadmap for organizations that want to establish a formalized governance methodology for the management of the open source products, taking into consideration issues such as software quality and community reliability. The governance framework is designed to be included in a more complete software assurance system for open source software.

Keywords

Software Assurance Open Source Governance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., El Ioini, N.: Open Source Systems Security Certification. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., Frati, F., Madravio, M.: Open Source solution to secure e-government services. In: Encyclopedia of Digital Government. Idea Group Inc., USA (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ardagna, C.A., Banzi, M., Damiani, E., Frati, F., El Ioini, N.: An Assurance Model for OSS Adoption in Next-Generation Telco Environments. In: Proc. of 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST 2009), pp. 619–624. IEEE Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans, M.W., Marciniak, J.J.: Software quality assurance & management. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E., Frati, F.: FOCSE: An OWA-based Evaluation Framework for OS Adoption in Critical Environments. In: Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation, pp. 3–16. Springer, Boston (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banzi, M., Bruno, G., Caire, G.: To What Extent Does It Pay to Approach Open Source Software for a Big Telco Player? Open Source Development. In: Communities and Quality, pp. 307–315. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Best Practices in Open source Governance (2010), https://fossbazaar.org/content/best-practices-open-source-governance
  8. 8.
    Fitzgerald, B.: The transformation of Open Source Code. Management Information Systems Quarterly 30(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    FLOSSmole: Collaborative collection and analysis of Free/Libre/open Source Project Data (2010), http://flossmole.org
  10. 10.
    Franck, E., Jungwirth, C.: Reconciling Investors and Donators - The Governance Structure of Open Source. Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensführung und politik Universität Zürich, Working Paper No. 8 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Laat, P.B.: Governance of Open Source Software: State of the Art. J. Manage Governance 11, 165–177 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lattemann, S., Stieglitz, C.: Framework for Governance in Open Source Communities. In: Proc. of the 38th Hawaii IEEE International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDermott, J., Fox, C.: Using Abuse Case Models for Security Requirements Analysis. In: Proc. of the 15th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 1999), Washington, DC, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Mahony, S., Ferraro, F.: The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community. Academy of Management Journal 50(5), 1079–1106 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OpenBRR: A Framework for Evaluating Open Source Software (2010), http://www.openbrr.org
  16. 16.
    Qualipso Project: Trust and Quality in Open Source systems (2010), http://www.qualipso.org
  17. 17.
    Rosen, L.: Open Source Licensing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun Whitepapers: Free and Open Source Licensing (2010), http://mediacast.sun.com/users/sunmink/media/sunlicensingwhitepaper042006.pdf
  19. 19.
    TeleManagement Forum: Business Process Framework (eTOM) (2010), http://www.tmforum.org/browse.aspx?catID=1647
  20. 20.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transaction Systems, Man, Cybernetics 18(1), 183–190 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio A. Ardagna
    • 1
  • Massimo Banzi
    • 2
  • Ernesto Damiani
    • 1
  • Fulvio Frati
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Tecnologie dell’InformazioneUniversità degli Studi di MilanoCremaItaly
  2. 2.TelecomItalia TILab - Vertical Platforms & VAS - Vertical Platforms InnovationTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations